Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robbie Anderson traded to Arizona


jamos14
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

They got next to nothing in return for him. 
 

I would’ve sent him home and had him sit there all year then cut him. Robbie wins in this situation. DJ might as well lay into the WR coach this week now

You’d rather get no draft pick and be petty vs trade him for whatever draft capital we got? 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, frankw said:

Full stop you dudes still carrying water for that lunatic look like clowns I hope you realize it. No one else on the team showed their ass like that yesterday even though they had every right to and how many of the bottom of the roster guys make even half as much as him? Raise your standards.

You don’t have to like Robby but there are a bunch of racist ass comments in here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

As of right now, not counting this trade or the carry over we are at: image.png.341d8fbd17d68884ae8ca50780fadde6.png

This is directly from OTC. This move plus carry over puts us in a manaegable cap position, plus this doesnt include the cap ceiling growing.

 

Am I missing something? 

That $11M in the red is negative cap space, so the $12M we save next year basically gets that to zero. Then we take the $10M we have currently and roll that over= $10M

 

Spotrac already adjusted for the trade and by their cap estimation we're still negative $5M for next year

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/cap/2023/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pakmeng said:

Thank goodness he wasn't simply cut like suggested by several here.

I mean there’s a decent chance it’s a conditional 7th, I.e. not much different than just cutting him. Glad we found a taker but cutting him would’ve been the other option for sure if we couldn’t find another team to take him. He wasn’t gonna be on the roster after yesterday anyways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

As of right now, not counting this trade or the carry over we are at: image.png.341d8fbd17d68884ae8ca50780fadde6.png

This is directly from OTC. This move plus carry over puts us in a manaegable cap position, plus this doesnt include the cap ceiling growing.

 

Am I missing something? 

Rashad got the same math

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Technically speaking, Fields has been a better QB than Bryce Young in the NFL.  I mean it’s bottom rung comparing by BY isn’t better.  Thats what I don’t get about the talk this week.  We don’t have a QB edge 
    • Might be different against a team with no legitimate pass catching options outside of their rookie TE though.  Their #1 WR tomorrow has 8 catches this season, next best WR receptions number this year is 4. If we can't defend that while Horn travels with their TE, then we have some serious problems.   Maybe we don't end up doing that in the end, but it's probably how I'd be scheming up the defense tomorrow when they have only 1 non RB pass catching option.
    • I fought sleep to stay awake just to watch that fumble on the goal line as we were going in for the go ahead score and said fug it, I'm going to bed. I've seen this movie before. I know how this ends. This bullshit of having California teams in conference with east coast teams is trash. That game probably didn't end until 2:30AM. Hell, it was 2AM at the time of the fumble and there was still 3+ minutes to play. In conference games being played into the 2AM hour for local audiences is terrible for the game. And the worst rule in football really does need fixed. Fumbling through the endzone or a fumble recovers by the D in the end zone should not result in a touch back and the ball on the 20. Fumbling through the endzone should not be a turnover. Fumbling out of bounds isn't a turnover anywhere else on the field. That should be the offense's ball on the one yard line. If the D recovers it in the endzone it should be the D's ball on the one yard line. Everyone knows this and everyone talks about it so just fix it already. If Cal was getting the ball at the goal line instead of out to the 20 I would've kept watching. That's a completely different scenario than the ball at the 20.
×
×
  • Create New...