Matt Corral our 2023 starter

[Panthers Fan 69]

Give him the starting reps. Whoever we draft #1. Let him sit for as long as humanly possible.  Matt Corral then let Young, Stroud, or Levis sit.   Like Flacco and Jackson or Favre and Rodgers. 

[Daddy_Uncle]

A new coach may not want him. Wouldn't make sense to draft a top QB #1 to sit behind the previous year's 3rd round pick. 

[stan786]

Lmao I'm not getting into this in here as well.  Have at it @DaveThePanther2008I tap.

[rippadonn]

[DaveThePanther2008]

The whole point of the conversation is whoever is going to be our HC is going to let both QBs compete for the job.  No HC is going to just give the job to the #1 pick.  It is not a good move by any coach just to hand the job at any position to a high draft choice.  

Most coaches say, draft position doesn't matter once you start workouts.  Tell me I'm wrong.

 

[Brooklyn 3.0]

Corral - 23 yrs old

Stroud - 21 yrs old

Young - 21 yrs old

Levis - 23 yrs old

 

Yeah ... they're going to sit behind Corral, lol.

[mrcompletely11]

11 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

The whole point of the conversation is whoever is going to be our HC is going to let both QBs compete for the job.  No HC is going to just give the job to the #1 pick.  It is not a good move by any coach just to hand the job at any position to a high draft choice.  

Most coaches say, draft position doesn't matter once you start workouts.  Tell me I'm wrong.

 

Your wrong

[Camp Fodder]

What I saw of Matt Corral looked like he had never played football before. I Think his ceiling is a number 2 guy

[Panthercougar68]

27 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Your wrong

You’re*

(c’mon you gave the lay up)

but sitting behind corral is dumb. We will probably sign a vet to be the actual vet on the roster.

Edited October 23, 2022 by Panthercougar68

[Waldo]

I have no problem with Corral coming in to compete for a roster spot. Relying on a guy who looked really bad and then hit IR before the season started would be a bad strategy.

If we draft a guy at the top of the draft, and we will, then it shouldn't even be a competition unless they draft poorly. It's Ickey and BC all over again from this year. All we did was waste time and reps to get ready for game 1, there should never have been a competition. Play Ickey or you are already admiting you fugged up so just give him the reps. Unless we trade back then play the rookie or you fugged up. 

If they like Corral so much then don't sign a vet.

[mrcompletely11]

Just now, Waldo said:

I have no problem with Corral coming in to compete for a roster spot. Relying on a guy who looked really bad and then hit IR before the season started would be a bad strategy.

If we draft a guy at the top of the draft, and we will, then it shouldn't even be a competition unless they draft poorly. It's Ickey and BC all over again from this year. All we did was waste time and reps to get ready for game 1, there should never have been a competition. Play Ickey or you are already admiting you fugged up so just give him the reps. Unless we trade back then play the rookie or you fugged up. 

If they like Corral so much then don't sign a vet.

Corral cannot practice until august

free agency is in march

they are signing a vet

[Growl]

41 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

 No HC is going to just give the job to the #1 pick.  

 

Yes they are

[DaveThePanther2008]

35 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Your wrong

So you're saying our new head coach is going to hand the job to #1 pick.

OK if you say so.

BUT YOU'RE WRONG

as usual

[1of10Charnatives]

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

The whole point of the conversation is whoever is going to be our HC is going to let both QBs compete for the job.  No HC is going to just give the job to the #1 pick.  It is not a good move by any coach just to hand the job at any position to a high draft choice.  

Most coaches say, draft position doesn't matter once you start workouts.  Tell me I'm wrong.

 

You are not wrong that they say this.

You are wrong if you think they mean it.

Please cite for me an instance where a HC has sat a highly drafted rookie QB behind a lower round might as well be a rookie prospect.