Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PJ Haters. Put some respect on his name.


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

PJ, Corral, and rookie?  We definitely need a vet QB to help with our rookie.  Can PJ be that guy?

No, unfortunately.  That's the reason the next HC hire is so crucial.  I like Wilks, but it needs to be a offensive minded dude with a background in developing QBs.  However, I do not want to sign a wet nurse either.  Waste of money and roster space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

PJ, Corral, and rookie?  We definitely need a vet QB to help with our rookie.  Can PJ be that guy?

No.

PJ is one of those guys who can keep both teams in the game.

He’s certainly capable of big plays, but in between those big plays are a lot of average to bad ones.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say that pass to DJ was a beauty but I cannot stress enough how this is just more of the same turd polishing we have done with every other QB since Kyle Allen. If anything that play should be indicative of what we should be expecting more often if we didn't have a QB who wasted drives for 3 quarters and threw touchdowns for the other team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

I will say that pass to DJ was a beauty but I cannot stress enough how this is just more of the same turd polishing we have done with every other QB since Kyle Allen. If anything that play should be indicative of what we should be expecting more often if we didn't have a QB who wasted drives for 3 quarters and threw touchdowns for the other team.

Nah, not from me.  I never believed in Kyle Allen.  Nor many if any of the other guys since Cam started breaking down.

And I'm not even saying PJ is a starter or long term answer.  I'm just saying I appreciate him and love the dog he has in him.  And despite all of the odds he has overcome, and even the fact people are shitting on him for finding himself in this position, as an undrafted guy who was an afterthought is crazy.  He still has a winning record as a starter.  It reminds me a lot of Jake...  also in how he has some mind-boggling negative plays and then comes back and does poo like that 70-yards-in-the-air bomb to DJ.  If it isn't anything else, it's fun.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...