Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams Offering Two (Future) Firsts for Burns


Recommended Posts

Just now, pantherj said:

The last sentence is the important part.

It really is. Especially when you’re working for someone like Tepper. Which is why we’ve pissed away a lot for Bridgewater, Darnold and Baker. 

And it’ll continue to be a deciding factor in a lot of key decisions unfortunately 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

LOL you are unintelligent (and exactly the type of f150 I was talking about)

Delete your account

You put two Lamars on this D and we have a whole new team.

He was and will always be the bar I measure our 5 and 7 techniques. 

Of course you don't know what those are.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

So if we don't end up liking one of the top QBs this year or aren't in a position to get one, how much easier would it be to move with 2 1sts in 24 and an extra in 25 as compensation. There's a lot of dynamics at play. I like Burns, but if trading him could increase the likelihood of getting a franchise QB, I gotta make that move. Way more at play than just Burns for picks. We gotta know how the GM and coaches view this year's qb prospects as well. 

...i'm like don't pick a QB if its not there....just cause we need one. we stretchin this shtt into 24 anyways...build the core to support one, when we decide we want one in the draft... tipper 3 years behind on what he shoulda done...now its time to pay the pipper....no short cuts.... Trade Burns...jayzus. First round picks are big trading money.

Edited by Pimpdaddy
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

Please remember, the "two 1sts" the rams are supposedly offering in 24 & 25 are basically the equivalent to a second and third this year.

So magically, the day after the season ends they become *poof* first rounders again. I get that to an extent, but a first in two years is very attractive to a rebuilding team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ECHornet said:

So magically, the day after the season ends they become *poof* first rounders again. I get that to an extent, but a first in two years is very attractive to a rebuilding team. 

Today yes. 2 and 3 years down the road, not as much. That is the point. You can't ack like time doesn't exist, that is not how investments work. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It means stop using the same logic on skipping over a HUGE need and waiting for the next year.  Draft one this year not in 2024, no 2025, no 2026....  We should have sucked it up and drafted Fields IMO 2 years ago.  

Don't mean to re-hash old news but there was zero guarantee he would've been available.

sure hindsight is hindsight but we didn't know that at the time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would take the giants roster over Panthers. Lawrence, 3 OLB/DEs, Thomas, and nabers. Lawrence is better than dbrown and Thomas is better than icky. Panthers don't have one edge that would start over those 3 not matter how people feel about burns. Id believe....I think I would take nabers over the whole WR group....Id need to think about, but I feel it is right or 50/50..... Now after the top 10, Panthers may have claim. Im just not that big of a NFL fan like past time to make a good case. I'd just take giants on their top talent.    I will say this, if BY carries this team to the playoffs, he alone would flip this. 
    • Looks like he ran out of real estate.  He had 5 total TDs. As good as we have ever seen in Carolina? Looks like he is the only QB in our history with 3 passing and 2 rushing TDs and he tied a single game record of 5 TDs in one game with Cam and Beurlein.  Throw in his 73.4% completions and zero turnovers, literally the ONLY thing you could argue against statistically is total yardage which was only 275.  You may not agree with that statement (not 100% sure I do), but it's really not THAT wild...
    • I have for too long lacked giving good posting beers, fire, etc.  Good post, its beyond prove it time and until then 30s is where they belong. 
×
×
  • Create New...