If we traded Burns

[Aussie Tank]

And and and and we’re gonna have to pay him 100 mill to stay around 

[Snake]

It was a mistake to not trade him and still seems like Tepper isn't allowing this team to truly rebuild. I don't understand why Moore and Burns are untouchable. 

[Montsta]

2 hours ago, Shotgun said:

These would have been a our next drafts if we had made the Burns trade. Looks like a good way to rebuild a team to me.

2023: 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5

2024: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 6

2025: 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7

Well poo when you put it out all easy to read like that…sure looks awfully good. 

[Brooklyn 3.0]

2 hours ago, NAS said:

We were not offered 2023 picks and so you really want to wait until 2024 or 2025 to capitalize on them? 

You think we can compete next year?

[Castavar]

2 hours ago, Shotgun said:

These would have been a our next drafts if we had made the Burns trade. Looks like a good way to rebuild a team to me.

2023: 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5

2024: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 6

2025: 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7

Not to mention all the money that could have been used elsewhere that we are going to spend on Burns. Just an all around flub by the front office.

[WUnderhill]

I find it very difficult to judge Fitterer from the outside looking in. I really doubt he is the final shot caller on these trades and find it much more likely that Tepper is the one approving or rejecting them. Either way, it was incredibly dumb to turn down that package for Burns.

[micnificent28]

3 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

So instead they kept Burns and still stunk lol. Real good post… smh

Next year will be a whatever year anyways. With whatever rookie QB we have and new head coach getting their feet wet. Picks in 2024 and 2025 were exactly what we needed

Unfortunately working for David Tepper left Fitterer no choice but to decline or he wouldn’t have been around to use those picks.  

So of course we the fans of this dumpster fire of an organization are the ones left to suffer

its not burns falut they stink. Hes one of the few parts that work. why would you trade a working peice to replace the same peace and hope it works?

[Eric4280]

We don’t have to keep beating the dead horse and focus on the miserable. It’s a huge opportunity lost, we get it.

[Move the Panthers to Raleigh]

3 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Burns is not worth two 1s and a 2. No one on this team is. Very few players in the NFL are. Should have taken that trade. I don't care where the picks fall. And future picks can used as leverage to move up in this draft. 

word

[mrcompletely11]

6 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

its not burns falut they stink. Hes one of the few parts that work. why would you trade a working peice to replace the same peace and hope it works?

The grammar in this post is impressive. 

Edited November 7, 2022 by mrcompletely11

[Move the Panthers to Raleigh]

3 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

So instead they kept Burns and still stunk lol. Real good post… smh

Next year will be a whatever year anyways. With whatever rookie QB we have and new head coach getting their feet wet. Picks in 2024 and 2025 were exactly what we needed

Unfortunately working for David Tepper left Fitterer no choice but to decline or he wouldn’t have been around to use those picks.  

So of course we the fans of this dumpster fire of an organization are the ones left to suffer

So true. Why must every pick be for 2023? We're not gonna turn everything around in one fuging year. If we had 2 1sts for the next couple years of the rebuild that would have been huge.

[Wolfcop]

That hurts too see lit laid  out like that. Missed opportunity.

Edited November 7, 2022 by Wolfcop

[micnificent28]

people here dont seem to understand all 1st round picks are not equal.  Burns taken at what 14-15 almost assures you he is one of the top 2 or so players at his position. you take the rams 28th or 32 pick those guys on the trade value chart might not equal up to the caliber player burns is. those picks might not =the value of the 15 pick on the trade value chart. Not to mention it was a outstanding pass rusher draft.

we have seen classes where there are very few edge rushers that go in the first so what if that year is next year?  also saying he isnt worth it is dumb. If a super bowl team like the ram who evaluates talent better than draft picks say hey we will give you 2 1st and a second for your young stud then guess what they see the talent and value as well.

[Move the Panthers to Raleigh]

6 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

people here dont seem to understand all 1st round picks are not equal.  Burns taken at what 14-15 almost assures you he is one of the top 2 or so players at his position. you take the rams 28th or 32 pick those guys on the trade value chart might not equal up to the caliber player burns is. those picks might not =the value of the 15 pick on the trade value chart. Not to mention it was a outstanding pass rusher draft.

we have seen classes where there are very few edge rushers that go in the first so what if that year is next year?  also saying he isnt worth it is dumb. If a super bowl team like the ram who evaluates talent better than draft picks say hey we will give you 2 1st and a second for your young stud then guess what they see the talent and value as well.

Coping hard here