Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is RB still a draft need?


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd love to resign foreman for 4/5 mil a year. If that doesnt happen would love Tucker from Syracuse in the 3rd. I know Robinson or Gibbs early in the 2nd would be nice, but really hope we use that for a TE that can catch or quality linebacker.  Paying Thomas that contract after getting Tremble baffles me still.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean this is the one thing teams like the Bears get right. Draft a running back every year or every other year in the 4th or later, ride them into the ground, let them walk away while you replace them with another young fresh legged back. 
 

Draft them late and never pay them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PappyMay said:

I'd love to resign foreman for 4/5 mil a year. If that doesnt happen would love Tucker from Syracuse in the 3rd. I know Robinson or Gibbs early in the 2nd would be nice, but really hope we use that for a TE that can catch or quality linebacker.  Paying Thomas that contract after getting Tremble baffles me still.

Paying Thomas just baffles me regardless.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

With Foreman playing the best RB ball since 2019 CMC, is this a high priority in the draft?

I say yes . Foreman will be 27 next year.  And is a bruising runner.  It’s a young man’s game. 

we don’t need to spend a high pick on a committee RB.  And you can find legit runners  in rounds 3, 4 and 5. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CRA said:

I say yes . Foreman will be 27 next year.  And is a bruising runner.  It’s a young man’s game. 

we don’t need to spend a high pick on a committee RB.  And you can find legit runners  in rounds 3, 4 and 5. 

I don't think age matters as much as tread for RBs. Foreman has 331 career carries and 353 career total touches. CMC, despite missing 23 games, has 269 carries and 366 touches since 2020 alone.

Edited by UNCrules2187
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...