Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bruce Arians For HC?

Asaria

By Asaria,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Sgt Schultz Grand Master

Sgt Schultz

Posted
Posted

I've never been all that sold on Arians as a HC.  Without Brady and the veteran talent influx at Tampa, he would be average or slightly above.

I don't hate the guy, but he is one of those coaches who is going to do things his way, even if it is not working.  He and Brady apparently locked horns on that early on.  Worse, he will abandon what is working to do things his way, even when the results immediately afterwards make it obvious it was a bad decision.

Plus, I think that for his own longevity here on planet earth, he needs to take things easier than a HC can afford or he would be willing to. 

Hard pass.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Asaria said:

One name I’ve not seen anyone bring up is Bruce Arians, and I’m kinda curious why. He brought the Cardinals to relevance, and they immediately shat the bed after he left(Sorry Wilks) and he took over a Bucs team that hadn’t done anything for years, and helped lead them to a super bowl. You can say Brady was the main reason why, but after being forced out by Brady this off season, that team has taken a major step back.

 

Not to mention the work he did with the colts in keeping them together and leading them to the playoffs as a intern coach.

 

I know he’s older and maybe he’s done with coaching, but considering he was forced out as Bucs HC; I think he might still have that itch.

I read that Arians is a real doucher. Also, he was not forced out as head coach was he? I thought he just retired?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Day1PanthersFan Veteran

Day1PanthersFan

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I've never been all that sold on Arians as a HC.  Without Brady and the veteran talent influx at Tampa, he would be average or slightly above.

I don't hate the guy, but he is one of those coaches who is going to do things his way, even if it is not working.  He and Brady apparently locked horns on that early on.  Worse, he will abandon what is working to do things his way, even when the results immediately afterwards make it obvious it was a bad decision.

Plus, I think that for his own longevity here on planet earth, he needs to take things easier than a HC can afford or he would be willing to. 

Hard pass.

And The Bucs are so much better without him aren't they , the same Bucs that couldn't score a TD against us 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sgt Schultz Grand Master

Sgt Schultz

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

And The Bucs are so much better without him aren't they , the same Bucs that couldn't score a TD against us 

I take it you believe that is due to Arians' brilliance and not the fact they lost Gronk, Brady has been so-so, and they lost several other pieces (especially OL).  But, sure, you're right, Arians would have had them right up there with the Vikings and Eagles.

Check please! 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      well, my thoughts on AT remain the same.  He is occupies too much oxygen.  Too many reps that will serve us no real purpose as he is gone after this year.  We need to be developing Tmac, XL, Coker, Saunders, etc.    So, letting AT go is more about developing the young guys.  Also clearing a spot for another young guy to be added.   They never should of pulled him back from retirement w/ a thank you paycheck IMO to begin with.   The cons of AT outweight the pros for me.  I want to develop our young guys.  
    • mrcompletely11
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      I honestly dont get the hype about horn jr
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I mean, you aren't getting much for an old WR who likely is done in the NFL after the next 17 are over.  but, for those not wanting to lose a Jimmy Horn type due to the bodies in front of him....it would get him a spot.  I mean, the O should be running through Tmac, XL, Coker, Sanders.   AT IMO stunts development as he occupies often ideal spots for youngsters to get the ball working the area of the field he does
×
×
  • Create New...