Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF grades (Week 11)


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

1. DE Amaré Barno: 74.9
2. S Sam Franklin Jr.: 70.1
3. LB Frankie Luvu: 69.6
4. S Xavier Woods: 68.2
5. CB Jaycee Horn: 65.8

Sam Franklin... low key becoming a beast on ST. If you would have asked me b4 this game though I would've never suggested he see playing time. But yesterday he made a couple of plays that caught my attention. 

Luvu and Woods are two players I'm glad we locked up for more than a year. I love the constant communication I see on defense. 

Barno though.... he's a project but I'd keep him around. Get that man a personal chef and lock him in the weight room. For where he was picked...if yesterday is as any early indication...I'm liking the returns. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Martin said:

What didn’t you like about his game this week? 

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

Edited by PNW_PantherMan
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Why earth does the coaching staff want CJ Henderson in the parking lot before the snap?? If trust level is that bad, play a different CB...

 

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Play zone 10 yards off a guy they can usually keep separation 

Because Wilks' approach is the same as Ron's. Play 10 deep on that soft coverage. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yep and apparently if you don't think so, you're too dumb to even converse with.😩

Burns sack was a blown assignment and he went completely untouched to the QB.  The RT, for whatever reason, took another player.  I could have made that sack.  Just say'n... it is what it is.  Hey, Burns padded his sack stats and ain't mad about it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

Yes. One man negates him in the run game. He needs to get bigger and stronger. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was routinely taken care of by a single blocker the entire game.  Most of the times he makes a play is when someone else gets penetration and forces the play back to him, or they forget to block him entirely.  One of his hurries was completely unblocked.  Same with the sack

I didn’t catch the whole game, but from what I saw the defense outside of Henderson was very, very good. Looked like Burns held up very well against the run and I didn’t see any mistakes on his past. If I remember correctly he bullrushed the LT a few times. He’s no Lawrence Taylor for sure, and he never will be, but I thought he had a good game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have more faith in XL improving than I do in Tmac being a true number 1 recuever
    • Round 1. TMac arguably the best WR in the draft Round 2. Scour ton mentioned as a possible 1st round edge.     Texas A&M did not use him the same way Purdue did. After the 2023 season he was listed as a first round grade. I believe had Texas A&M used him like they did at Purdue he never makes it out of round 1. Round 3 Princely Umanmielen, we'll go by Princely.  Another highly graded player we got in a lower round. As the video suggests, even if he plays only on passing down it's a positive. Give him a couple of years to develop a he could be a three down player.  Round 4a Etienne IMO a huge upgrade over Blackshear. I can see him in a similar role as CMC without the heavy workload. He can run in between the tackles and has some shifty moves. Give Canales some flexibility. A fellow huddler pointed out UGA running backs don't see the field if they cannot pick up the blitz. Really good pick. Round 4b Ransom a hard hitting safety that has played three different positions on defense. Great pick Round 5a Cam Jackson a massive NT in round 5. I believe a solid rotational pick in a lower round. We added a beast that could make offenses quiver when he's lined up with Brown. Great Value  Round 5b Evans This is another player that can block and has good hands. He also had better seasons before 2024. As a rookie he's probably leaps and bounds better than Ian Thomas. I think he gives us a three headed monster at TE.  Round 6 Horn Jr. Many believe he's just going to be a KR/PR player. I believe there are going to be packages for him to get on the field as a WR. His speed with TMac and Thielen in the slot could be special. I'm really looking forward to seeing him in training camp. I've watched some film and he is very explosive.  Overall I love our picks. I honestly believe all of them will contribute this season. I don't believe we reached on one player in this draft.  This weekend we get a small look at these rookies     
×
×
  • Create New...