Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft position updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, 45catfan said:

You nailed nailed it.  After looking at this roster for next year, seeing our cap situation and seeing that this draft lacks super stars at the top but has good depth, I have come to same realization.  Build the team, find a competent HC, where that HC finds a stud OC and stop chasing franchise QBs for the time being.  When the time is right, snag the QB and stop forcing it. I'm thinking of the Pittsburgh situation when they drafted Big Ben.  He had success because while he played good as a rookie, the surrounding parts made him even better.

We could go this route or continue the failed Matt Rhule model or sabotage a brand new staff as we have seen in Denver when they sunk most of their resources into Russell Wilson.

It's going to be hard to find an offensive coordinator that's a stud without a quarterback. It'll also be impossible to retain them without them being given the head coaching job. That's why a lot of teams bring in offensive coordinators for head coaching positions as you lose them every couple years if they're competent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ocpanthertew714 said:

So it looks like we will procure another top 10 pick this draft.

 

I'm curious, is anyone for moving up to take one of the top two QB prospects??

 

This is exactly what will happen. Getting the wins for now may feel nice at the moment for the current coaches and players, the pick price for a new franchise QB keeps going up. 

I'm all for them winning out, as long as we all understand that it means many of this and next year's picks disappearing as @Krovvy said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BrisbanePanther said:

This is exactly what will happen. Getting the wins for now may feel nice at the moment for the current coaches and players, the pick price for a new franchise QB keeps going up. 

I'm all for them winning out, as long as we all understand that it means many of this and next year's picks disappearing as @Krovvy said.

I just don't think our GM is the type to move up in the first round.

But only time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Ocpanthertew714 said:

So it looks like we will procure another top 10 pick this draft.

 

I'm curious, is anyone for moving up to take one of the top two QB prospects??

 

No, not in this draft. I would just take a shot on one of the other qb's myself. It just depends on who's taken before us or who's available around our selection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always about the totality of the team, and the leaders directing that collective. An elite QB makes things easier, of course, but it's not a prerequisite to winning. If you have many of the right pieces in place and competent QB play, you can still be a consistent winning team.

Ideally, you want it all, but there's always holes on every NFL roster. It's about building the best group of 53 (55) and coaching staff / front office that you can on a rolling basis.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

It's going to be hard to find an offensive coordinator that's a stud without a quarterback. It'll also be impossible to retain them without them being given the head coaching job. That's why a lot of teams bring in offensive coordinators for head coaching positions as you lose them every couple years if they're competent.

Lateral moves are pretty rare these days and someone is stupid to pass up a promotion because they aren't assured a ideal situation.  If said newbie OC gets looks in 2-3 years for a HC job, that's okay, it means the Panthers should be a playoff team.  Worry about the future as it approaches, worry about the present...now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

It's always about the totality of the team, and the leaders directing that collective. An elite QB makes things easier, of course, but it's not a prerequisite to winning. If you have many of the right pieces in place and competent QB play, you can still be a consistent winning team.

Ideally, you want it all, but there's always holes on every NFL roster. It's about building the best group of 53 (55) and coaching staff / front office that you can on a rolling basis.

You have a better chance finding a good to great qb than you will an elite one in the draft. Elite qbs are very rare but good qbs can be found in almost every draft if you have a smart staff and a little bit of luck. Great qb's only show up in the draft every 4 or 5 drafts and are usually overlooked.  It's It's all about scheme fit. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...