Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Undo 1 Rhule Decision


CanadianCat
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

What if games is a child's game. Meaning immature.  

I don't care how you look at it. 

 I don't play such stupidity. 

Yes you do. Everyday. Bare minimum, your brain calculates what ifs unconsciously. 
 

On a separate note, you know what else is a child’s game? Football. 
 

But hey, pretend to be whatever you want. This is the internet after all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Yes you do. Everyday. Bare minimum, your brain calculates what ifs unconsciously. 
 

On a separate note, you know what else is a child’s game? Football. 
 

But hey, pretend to be whatever you want. This is the internet after all. 

I love it when people try to imply people do things they don't.  

Then try to justify it.  

I understand a lot of people do it.  I don't.   Thanks for your attempt to tell me what I do and don't do. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I love it when people try to imply people do things they don't.  

Then try to justify it.  

I understand a lot of people do it.  I don't.   Thanks for your attempt to tell me what I do and don't do. 

 

Everyone does it. Literally everyone. You are part of everyone. 
 

It may not be as on the nose as “what if Rhule didn’t blah blah blah” but the thinking doesn’t have to include the words “what” and “if” to be a what if. 
 

I assume you make decisions, like the decision to post on here. 
 

Some part of your brain evaluated whether or not to post a reply to me. What if you did? You have the result here. What if you did not? I would have nothing to respond to. 
 

You aren’t better or worse than anyone else, and you play “kid games” just like anyone else (your definition).

 

Although reducing what ifs to what “kids” do, when any form of rational thinking includes what if thinking is…well…something a “kid” might do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

the guy with the 1000s of alts aka chuck was 100% right about parsons... 

I mean I wanted Fields but if we get to change something Parsons is the best in the top 10 imo. Horn imo would be second though including Lawrence so we didn't pick bad. We just didn't get the player of most impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Snake said:

I mean I wanted Fields but if we get to change something Parsons is the best in the top 10 imo. Horn imo would be second though including Lawrence so we didn't pick bad. We just didn't get the player of most impact.

In a rare move, I totally whiffed on Parsons. I thought he was a normal MLB-type-role player.......he is a game changer. I personally thought Jamin Davis was the better MLB.(hes not). If you were to have a all-world team, parsons is somewhere on the starting D.... 

I blame some of this on me de-valuing the MLB spot, but again Parsons is not a MLB he is michael myers dealing with a group of teens in a abandoned house.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2022 at 1:42 PM, rayzor said:

Saying yes to the job.

Beat me to it. 
 

Let’s just say that one’s off the table. Hiring all his college buddies who had zero practical NFL experience. Though. If I really had to pick it would he firing Brady. Tepper should have dropped Rhule last year when he was going to fire Brady. Just like Tepper did this year when I’m guessing he was going to fire Wilks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Basbear said:

In a rare move, I totally whiffed on Parsons. I thought he was a normal MLB-type-role player.......he is a game changer. I personally thought Jamin Davis was the better MLB.(hes not). If you were to have a all-world team, parsons is somewhere on the starting D.... 

I blame some of this on me de-valuing the MLB spot, but again Parsons is not a MLB he is michael myers dealing with a group of teens in a abandoned house.. 

Well Parsons isn't a MLB. He's another Von Miller - a pass rusher in a 4-3 playing at LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2022 at 9:16 PM, Carolina Cajun said:

Signing robbie anderson.  Since we've released him it's become so obvious how toxic he was but not only that, he is insanely shitty yet we kept that turd as put #2 for years.  He was literal cancer for our locker room.

I agree. If we truly stick to 'undo-ing' a decision instead of changing a draft pick/trade for someone else, then this is it for me. 

I don't mind the Darnold trade. It was a gamble. Wish we didn't exercise the 5th year option so early, but I also understand that would have been disastrous if he had played well his first year here. Imagine if CMC doesn't get hurt last year, Darnold continues his first 3 game production and we win 8-9 games. Had we not exercised the 5th year option, we likely would have signed Darnold to a 3-4 year contract worth ~25mil per. Yikes.

I also don't mind the Baker trade. For what we gave up, it was worth it at the time. Few expected him to perform as poorly as he did, but it cost us next to nothing.

The two biggest blunders, imo, were signing Robbie and resigning Ian Thomas. Robbie was the bigger mistake because it cost us more money and his attitude was a risk.

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Basbear said:

In a rare move, I totally whiffed on Parsons. I thought he was a normal MLB-type-role player.......he is a game changer. I personally thought Jamin Davis was the better MLB.(hes not). If you were to have a all-world team, parsons is somewhere on the starting D.... 

I blame some of this on me de-valuing the MLB spot, but again Parsons is not a MLB he is michael myers dealing with a group of teens in a abandoned house.. 

Have to give Dan Quinn props on that one. He knows undersized DEs just Vic Beasley. We just valued CBs a bunch more than LB because anyone besides Snow would have taken LB for this team. Snow wanted a CB every year. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My read is they intended to try and get points but that first run and usage of the clock was done to hedge against things going poorly. Basically they shouldn't need all that time to score since they had multiple timeouts. Dirting that second play put us in a no-win situation. Sure you can run on 3rd down but ARI had timeouts so they still likely get the same result.
    • Anyone catch Adam archuletta referring to him as a “young qb” like bitch this is year three players are in the Super Bowl by now. 
    • I never said he had a good game in the Denver game.  As you said we had a good first drive ending in Bryce throwing a slant to XL for a TD.  It was garbage time but the back shoulder throw to Coker for the late TD was a great throw.   Throws like these in bad games are why I say he "can" do it and has the physical tools.  The question is can he do it consistently, continue to improve, grow and become our QB of the future.  Up to this point that was a hard no but with a new head coach and Bryce in his 2nd year it was 100% the right call to play out the year and see if he got better.  He did.   Two games into this year is still more of the up and down quality of play and coaching but there is still plenty of potential and we have 16 more games to decide if it's worth it to continue down this path. I don't know what will happen but I know cutting him or benching him now makes zero sense on any level. I said of those last 10 games we were only blown out in 2 of them.  I'll concede the Denver game was a blow out.  So 3 blowout loses and 7 competitive games, 4 of which we won, all decided by less than a TD.  Sounds like a team growing, improving and getting better.  All I want to do is see where that leads and if those examples of starting NFL level quarterbacking can continue to improve and become more consistent.   Anyone with pride would retire?  Laughable.  Do all of you quit in your daily lives every time things get tough or don't go your way?    
×
×
  • Create New...