Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield: Top Landing Spots


KatsAzz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

No reason they would do that.  They are out of the playoffs, and they would be spending money for no material gain.

I could see Seattle doing it though.  

It would hurt the 49ers chances for a deep run, thats the main reason. They dont need or want him, seahawks could do the same......49ers may have the best D when healthy, clear path to deep run even with a sucky-ass QB....

 

plus in thoery you could claim him and hope to the heavens some dumb team signs him to crazy deal thus giving you a shot at a late comp pick.... If baker is on your QB radar, what better/cheaper way than 1.4million(nfl pennies) for a 5 game tryout?? Much cheaper than signing him to some 12 million one year deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Why would Seattle do it? 

Youre in the car wash business. A local one is getting rid of a 2018 flow max 9000 thats in work condition. They even took it down and packed it all nice and neat. Your chief competitor needs one since theirs blew up and its not repairable this year. You dont need it, but have storage space. You are also much closer mileage wise and rivial has already called asking. Its first come first serve- What does one do??

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Wonder if they asked for behind the scenes vibes from CMC

It all seems to me the 49ers reached out to Baker via back door channels to try and facilitate his release. Classy move by the Panthers to cut him but I have a feeling they might have been considering it already 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, top dawg said:

Why would Seattle do it? 

Because Seattle is competing for the division and they may want keep SF from picking up a new qb.  Of course, I am sure that some here might think Seattle is better off letting SF have Mayfield.  But the original point was that there is no reason for Los Angeles to grab him with them having no shot at a playoff.  No reason to spend the money.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Because Seattle is competing for the division and they may want keep SF from picking up a new qb.  Of course, I am sure that some here might think Seattle is better off letting SF have Mayfield.  But the original point was that there is no reason for Los Angeles to grab him with them having no shot at a playoff.  No reason to spend the money.  

Yeah, @Basbear explained it (albeit using an analogy). I totally overlooked that angle from Seattle's perspective because of Geno (and Lock to a lesser degree).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see they blamed Slavin for the goal like I did. 
    • See this is the problem, you say "can't get off the line quick" and "can't separate quick" but in reality it's "he can get off the line better and create more separation" which are two completely different things. If he couldn't get off the line or separate, he wouldn't have put up the numbers he did and end up a Top 10 pick. But he can get better, and maybe more accurately, consistent with them both, and that will take his game to the next level.  These are things that are also much easier to improve once you get to the NFL than things like being a poor route runner or having bad hands, two of his strengths. Thinking he can't get open in the short passing game also shows you haven't watched enough tape on him, as he was used in that role so much in college with little issue getting open and making plays. And him not using his physicality as much isn't even something that hurts his game because he's so much more agile than a player of his size should be, which he used to his advantage.  Instead of throwing passes where he'd go up and box out a player like a TE or Mike Evans does, they use his athleticism and put the ball in places that only he can get to it, and he usually does (and yes, he'll still be able to do that against NFL DB's with his catch radius). But now that he's in the NFL, I'd like to see him get stronger and add that to his game because it also will help him take his game to another level. As I've said before, if he doesn't improve on those things at all, I think he's a Top 25 WR in this league, he's already that good.  But I think he'll improve on those things and be a perennial Top 10 WR and in his prime is considered and perform like Top 5 guy in some years. My expectations for him this year at 800 yards and 8 TDs (although I do think he'll get to 10 TDs) with a real chance at getting to 1,000.  But those expectations are because I think Thielen will lead the team in yards with close to 1k and XL/Coker each end up in the 500-600 range themselves, just too many mouths to feed this year for a rookie to dominate yardage, especially if we're running the ball well again. But if Thielen can't stay healthy or puts up sub 750 yards, then yea, my expectations for T-Mac likely shift to getting to 1k as a rookie.
    • Svech only 1 goal behind the guy they've pretty much already given the Conn Smythe to...
×
×
  • Create New...