Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Seahawks GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Really??

Maybe he just has super slow acceleration then. Seemed like he was running in slow motion when he got the ball

Go check out his Miami highlights.

He used to be the Gunner for us on STs (as well as the starting RB, obvs). Dude is quick in a straight line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Lolol I like this but at the same time that’s a lot of improvement from a disastrous failure to mediocrity. Next stop might just might be success lol. 2- games from now we could be leading the division.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tgrfan01 said:

id be fine with wilks being hired as head coach..team has taken own a whole new demeanor since he has taken over..dont pull a raiders who had the right man for the job as well but went with the sexy named coach and turned out to be a disaster.

The problem you have is that the NFL has moved on.

We dominated the lines of scrimmage and time of possession today and only won by a TD. You literally have zero room for error playing how Wilks likes. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome game!

Chuba had the game of his life.  No drops, a bunch of yards, several  first downs, a risky reach for a TD.  Could Rhule's wife been right?  Naaah.

Geno looked like shlt.  Jaycee intercepted 3 times, only 1 counted tho.

We beat a team with a winning record on the road.  It helps that their injured QB kept throwing to our team, but I'll take it.

ST has taken a big step back.  They had two big kick returns.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldhamA said:

The problem you have is that the NFL has moved on.

We dominated the lines of scrimmage and time of possession today and only won by a TD. You literally have zero room for error playing how Wilks likes. 

Nahhhh man if you are good enough you can run it and they can't stop it just like today.

 

Just impose your will. Hell if you execute you can tell them the play.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The problem you have is that the NFL has moved on.

We dominated the lines of scrimmage and time of possession today and only won by a TD. You literally have zero room for error playing how Wilks likes. 

we went o the road and beat the seahawks in dominating fashion..the game wasnt as close as the score says

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The problem you have is that the NFL has moved on.

We dominated the lines of scrimmage and time of possession today and only won by a TD. You literally have zero room for error playing how Wilks likes. 


Most games are decided by a score or less.

Regardless, I think Wilks is playing how he HAS TO play. The run game is our strength. We don’t have the QB or WR talent for a pass heavy offense.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The scoreboard doesn't lie.

yes it does..that garbage td by the hawks was just that..we dominated them..i get it though hiring a sexy name is cool it gets the talking head talking about us..but a sexy name doesnt always mean wins..see the raiders..their interim coach was far better than what they got now

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The problem you have is that the NFL has moved on.

We dominated the lines of scrimmage and time of possession today and only won by a TD. You literally have zero room for error playing how Wilks likes. 

I hoping he is having the offense play that way because he doesn’t trust Darnold yet. With the right QB maybe he lets the offense roll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...