Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Biggest draft needs...


Sam the Cat
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

How anyone can watch this crap and think about any position other than QB is beyond me

An elite QB, sure, but I don't see what Darnold did wrong today. You can win a lot of games with a QB that doesn't turn the ball over. 

We need a starting DE, a starting TE and a starting WR something fierce. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

We still need that franchise QB. You aren’t winning SB’s with Sam Darnold as your starter.

I would go TE, DE, LB and RB after that

Darnold or any journeyman QB makes sense...and also see what the Rookie can do.  Our draft position won't allow us to pick top 2-3 QBs  and even if we could they are not as great as the 2023 QBs.

Edited by Sam the Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldhamA said:

An elite QB, sure, but I don't see what Darnold did wrong today. You can win a lot of games with a QB that doesn't turn the ball over. 

We need a starting DE, a starting TE and a starting WR something fierce. 

Ok so when we play a team that can stop the run what do you think is going to happen?

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

QB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

everything else is somewhere down here

It’s this. If we are forced to play ball control smash mouth run game every week and throw for 130 yards a game we are in trouble. Best way to fix that is infuse the QB position with actual talent. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...