Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Erving


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Eclipse said:

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

Are you referring to his 3rd to last snap right before the 2min warning of the 4th quarter? At that point we were in clock killing mode and ready to settle for a field goal. Not sure I'd call it a momentum killer. Also that was his 17th snap played. 

 

DJ had a drive killer false start when we were on the Seahawks 11 yard line, maybe thats what you are thinking of?

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

Don't forget that the pounding were putting on is paying huge dividends in the 4th quarter. when was the last time you remember us literally running the ball down an opponents throat in the 4th quarter without them being able to do anything about it.  It's because of the first half pounding.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RumHam said:

Can someone explain why he was in? Moton sucks but this guy quickly reminds you of the upgrade to moton, who is clearly the weak link this year and shows just how historically bad it was under rhule

Do they have a post office in your world?

Local government? 

Or is everything just run by the pink elephants and giant snowmen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

WE'RE DOING SOMETHING THAT SEEMS TO WORK WELL!! WHY?? WHY, I ASK???

Because the narrative and base for Wilks to get HC position is coming to fruition. The anti Wilks crowd is starting to get increasingly negative and making louder comments that show a lack of football knowledge. It has literally been draft position, questions about not trading good players, now comes the questionable nitpicking, and then it will be all out screaming look how he did in Arizona. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eclipse said:

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

Thought the same thing. Although I guess Wilks deserves credit for mixing it up and trying to get him some useful reps since we are paying him.

It will never not be embarrassing that Rhule really sought him and Elflein out as priority free agents on day 1...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, vorbis said:

Panthers have been using extra linemen to jumpstart the running game since Steve Wilks took over. when Erving is in he's usually the 6th or 7th lineman on the field. see Cade Mays at fullback last couple games. it's just to get better matchups in run block, that's it. get that 6th OL to block a linebacker at the point of attack. that's all.

Kinda how the cowboys ran all over us last year and we couldn't do anything about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

 

13 hours ago, rayzor said:

that's what i was going to point out. a big part of the reason they have been so successful with the run game is that they put the added beef up front. Front 7s are just overwhelmed.

 

13 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

Add to the fact that modern NFL teams have really become lighter to defend the pass and it's why it has worked so well. The LBs these days are basically SS 10 years ago so those boys just eat them up. Got to give McAdoo credit. Hes playing 1998 football against teams trying to play 2022 ball. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Snake said:

Add to the fact that modern NFL teams have really become lighter to defend the pass and it's why it has worked so well. The LBs these days are basically SS 10 years ago so those boys just eat them up. Got to give McAdoo credit. Hes playing 1998 football against teams trying to play 2022 ball. 

what we're doing to others is what was done to us the last couple years. 

we kept getting bullied, but it was "ok" because it was part of rhule's plan or something like that. 

wilks gets in charge and we start becoming the bullies.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...