Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafting a QB is a total crap shoot according to a Hall of Fame QB.


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's not wrong. 

Doesn't matter where you take him, it's going to be a risk. There are no safe bets. Not much better off taking him in the top 5 picks than you are in the second half of the first round.

Won't know what you got until you see them play at the pro level. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That settles it. What we need to do is trade for cast-offs and take shots mid to late draft.

I don't know what it is about football comparative to other sports, but the amount of cherry picking of statistics and anecdotes is absurd. How is this difficult to understand.

NFL players are usually drafted, right? So, the higher you draft a player, the more likely that player has to be special. If 5 teams take a player at your position that you need, guess what? That's 5 players missing from your selection pool to find a great player.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a highschool OC coach and NFL network analyst, as far as I can tell he has never even coached in the NFL or done any FO stuff. 

I want to hear what Reid, BB and others like that have to say over Warner.

There is some truth there but if that is all you have as a GM, HC or OC in the NFL and can't see the difference between say Newton and Gabbert coming out then you are going to get fired. What the hell did Reid see with Mahomes or Beane/Daboll with Allen that made them take that swing? That is what I want to hear, not this generic overcomplication of it's hard and imperfect. 

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a sense he's right, in that you never really know before a guy plays in the NFL (and for some time at that), but if player evaluations were really worthless across the board you wouldn't see the success rate of draft picks decline with draft position on average.

There's always going to be hits and misses, but QB evaluations can give you an idea of how a player might do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

I am so tired of the mental gymnastics people go through to justify having a middle-of-the-pack draft pick. We are obviously at a disadvantage picking 8-12. I don’t wanna hear anymore “positive” spins on this subject 

 

?

This isn’t spin about draft position?… It’s a discussion on evaluating qbs in general.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway….it goes back to the question. Are franchise guys molded or they just exist.

As someone stated earlier, is it dumb luck that Josh Allen panned out or is there something in the interviews that peaked Beane and co’s interest to know know that this guy can play in the league.

Makes you wonder at all the players that were said to be busts because of the team were actually just busts in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s face it, there are good college QBs and some have extraordinary physical talent

There has to be a passion and a confidence to play the position 

guts

quick decisions 

i watched fields almost get cut into in the semi conference championships. He was Pissed at the hit.  As hurt as he clearly was, he got up and led them to a TD

That hit caught up to him in the finals 

but the kid got up.  You need a player who competes and when hit in the mouth, gets up, one that works to get better.

Getting hit in the mouth in the nfl happens a lot to top 10 draft picks as the  team they are going to is bad…they better be able to get out of the way.  

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...