Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Tepper is keen on Will Levis


Chris Smitty
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ForJimmy said:

I’m curious about Levis. I don’t think he will be as bad as people are thinking. He has a lot of good tools to work with, but I’m wrong more than I’m right so what do I know???

It’s easy for folks who look at numbers only to say he’s on a downward trend. He had a lot of injury and coaching issues this past season. I personally think he gets taken before we pick but if we draft him, he could end up being a good one. We will see. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

Tepper needs to keep his fugin nose out of the way the football team is ran

 

2 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Just a little late for that....

Tepper has kept his nose out of the management of the football team

Edited by top dawg
Typos, what else?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

1 hour ago, rebelrouser said:

We currently pick 8 and first round qb's have some of the biggest bust rates of any position. Blindly taking a qb in round 1 is not the answer. We need to keep our options open. Quality qb falls to us take him. If not, trade back and take the Notre Dame TE or edge or wr. I still want to see what Corral can do with some real coaching and practice snaps. 

You're looking at it all wrong.  QB's have the biggest bust rate of any position, period.  Regardless of round.

What is not disputable however is that non-first round QB's have a massive bust rate of about 90%, versus first round QB's who "only" bust at 50%.  If you like a QB and he's available at your pick you take him.  Regardless of round.

There is no roster that has TOO MANY good QB's on it.  Look no further than the 49ers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m curious about Levis. I don’t think he will be as bad as people are thinking. He has a lot of good tools to work with, but I’m wrong more than I’m right so what do I know???

I hope you are right, because I feel we are picking him. I don’t want him, but if he’s the selection, I’ll root for him to become elite and prove me wrong. If he’s the selection on draft night, I’ll come in here hopeful and excited. I really think he is going to be the pick if he’s there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...