Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Tepper is keen on Will Levis


Chris Smitty
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

That’s just a recycled article. I’m sure this thread will go on for pages but if you actually read the article it’s just refreshed content from earlier in the season.

The writer also contradicts their content multiple times. Not giving this the time of day ….. especially when the writer uses CJ Stroud and elite in the same sentence …

Pretty much.

Much ado about nothing here.

 

*leaves pointless thread*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I know I was just listing QBs that Tepper wanted not that he had an actual chance of getting them. So his choice of QB hasn’t been bad. 

And Tepper thought Rhule was a good idea, which cancels out pretty much everything else. Dude should just get out of the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

I hope you are right, because I feel we are picking him. I don’t want him, but if he’s the selection, I’ll root for him to become elite and prove me wrong. If he’s the selection on draft night, I’ll come in here hopeful and excited. I really think he is going to be the pick if he’s there. 

I see him as a Richardson top with not as high of a ceiling, but a higher floor. He isn’t as fast or big as AR, but is further along as a passer. He had a decent year last year. Both players were on rosters very outmatched in SEC competition with Levis’s OL being a complete disaster. Both OC’s didn’t know how to use them either. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, uncfan888 said:

You believe that? 

Yes. It has been reported several times that Tepper lets his hires run things pretty much as they see fit. We've also seen it in action on draft night. Furthermore, no one here has presented any credible evidence that Tepper meddles. None! That's not to say that he won't ever do it, especially after the miserable  Rhule era, but so far there is no indication that he's a meddlesome owner. If Tepper was some meddling owner as has been incorrectly stated here, we would have Justin Fields, point blank and period!

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a wild feeling that Levis is this year's Herbert where a ton of people are like "why is everyone so high on him, he's just big with a strong arm", but it turns out that his college coaches were completely misusing him the entire time and he can actually ball in the pros because he has the mental portion of things down.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Got a wild feeling that Levis is this year's Herbert where a ton of people are like "why is everyone so high on him, he's just big with a strong arm", but it turns out that his college coaches were completely misusing him the entire time and he can actually ball in the pros because he has the mental portion of things down.

I'm wondering this, too.  I like AR because his ceiling is sky-high, but scouts all seem VERY high on Levis still. I suppose the question is if Levis is more Herbert or Z Wilson.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

That’s just a recycled article. I’m sure this thread will go on for pages but if you actually read the article it’s just refreshed content from earlier in the season.

The writer also contradicts their content multiple times. Not giving this the time of day ….. especially when the writer uses CJ Stroud and elite in the same sentence …

Yeah this was printed a while back. Tepper may also be in on Florida State pitcher-turned-quarterback Chris Weinke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like Levis, at fugin' all rn.

But if the coach and GM (not just Tep) likes him as well I wouldn't care. Dude has a cannon, dude can flick it, has more than functional mobility. 

If he's the pick he's the pick. I'mma root for him all the same.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, KSpan said:

Well, if Tepper likes him then it seems clear the football people should avoid him.

The brain trust of the Panthers need to feel Teppers out by asking him which of the top rated players to avoid picking in the 1st rd., then go select that player because it would probably be the correct choice. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I'd rather have Richardson but that 53% completion percentage doesn't give me a lot of confidence, just like I like my quarterbacks to be able to beat Vanderbilt 

Richardson certainly has all the tools but I am not sure if he will be as accurate as he needs to be to find success in the NFL.

However, a lot of people were asking the same question about Cam Newton when he was drafted and we know how great a draft pick he turned out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...