Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Act as GM if we win the division….


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

What would you consider a good record for a coach that had 3 different starting QBs in the same season and had to overcome the hand he was dealt? IF we make the playoffs and win the South, he deserves STRONG consideration. 

Consideration but not the job. There are better coaches out their. 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Random drunk thought here but how would you feel if the following scenario played out…..

***We win the next two games and win the NFC South. Home playoff game***

What direction would you take if you were make believe Gm this upcoming offseason??

Here is mine:

-Steve Wilks is signed as our next head coach 

-We sign an exciting name as OC and have Macadoo back in another role with the team (our offense has been much improved lately)

-We re sign Darnold to a one year deal (he has has a 104.3 rating currently) and give him an opportunity to COMPETE for a starting role or be our top tier backup QB. We go into the season with Darnold, Corrall, AND rookie QB as our depth chart. 

-We re sign Bozeman to a 4 year deal, Foreman to a 1 year deal

-Extend Burns (which will also help cap next season)

-We sign a top tier TE (such as Schultz, Ertz,  Gesicki)

-We use our draft picks in round one, two, two, three, four, four, five on BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE that could be any position of need

Off-season decisions/needs

-Add one year to Shaq Thompsons contract to decrease his cap hit or cut him? If you keep him you are set at LB, if you cut him you have to sign a FA or draft LB high

-DE to start opposite Burns must be a draft pick. If we re sign Burns we will have good money tied up in the position. We have good depth with gross Matos and Haynes but both are depth only. We don’t have the money to sign a good player in FA so you need to draft one using a 1st or 2nd round pick depending on how the draft falls.

-Is Marshall our WR 2 for next season? 

-QB? Do you draft one in round one? If not do you take another shot with one of our two second round picks.
 

CEFE7511-D4DD-42B5-A616-1461927970BA.jpeg

54AEDA1C-6FCF-4FDF-AB6F-88FA2A49B834.jpeg

Pretty coherent random drunk thought!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

People are really hanging onto that 2014 season for some reason. The 2014 team would eat this team for lunch and we ain’t gonna get lucky and play a team without their starting QB. 
 

Huge difference with Luke and Cam vs now. Meh, Rivera has shown everyone where this ends. Feel good about not winning enough. I'm not celebrating that anymore and this year hasn't been fun or magical, it's pedestrian proceeded by complete incompetency. 

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Last year. Also you keep mentioning 1-5 record and yes it does matter. An interim HC having success when he is made interim is not abnormal. Most interims have success because they are injecting some newness into the team. 
Wilks success isn’t surprising. 
But, as I said before, stats don’t lie. Unless he has become some savant HC after he flamed out in Arizona. 
He will either make the playoffs but never make the Super Bowl. 
Fail once he has control because he isn’t a good HC. 

What?? In recent NFL history, that is absolutely false. The 3 interim coaches in 2020 went a combined 9-19.  Since 2013, including Wilks' 5-5 (and keep in mind I don't think he should just get the job if he losses out or something), interim coaches are 44-80. Definitely not resounding success - but is this being brought down by a few very bad interim coaches? The answer is no.

The only two interim coaches with winning records beyond one game were Bisaccia last year and Greg Williams in 2018.

The only interim head coach to take over a team with a winning record in the last 10 years was Bisaccia.  Most interim coaches take over trash teams, and perform like trash. A few take over for a one or two games - those guys are sometimes at .500.  Excluding Wilks and Bisaccia, and the coaches that coached fewer than 4 games, the average interim coach wins 2.7 games and coaches for 8.4 games. 

https://usbettingreport.com/news/how-have-interim-head-coaches-fared-in-the-nfl-in-the-past-10-years/

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We have to at least be competitive in the wildcard round for Wilks to stick IMO. Go out there and get beat by three TDs at home and that's a wrap.

Damn, the goalposts keep shifting.

If the dude wins the division from 1-5 he'll be retained. We embarrassed the Seahawks on the road and the Lions at home in a manner we've not done to anyone since 2015.

I'm not even a fan of Wilks, but he'll get the job if the next 2 weeks go to plan.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Damn, the goalposts keep shifting.

If the dude wins the division from 1-5 he'll be retained. We embarrassed the Seahawks on the road and the Lions at home in a manner we've not done to anyone since 2015.

I'm not even a fan of Wilks, but he'll get the job if the next 2 weeks go to plan.

I'm not opposed to retaining Wilks. I'm just saying he's not gonna be retained even if we do win the division but we get waxed by the Cowboys at home in the wildcard round. Tepper isn't gonna sit there watching the Cowboys enjoy a home playoff game at BOA and us getting our asses kicked and then say, "Yeah, that's my guy."

 

  • Pie 3
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...