Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's your offer to Chicago?


BrisbanePanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Nothing. I’m old enough to remember Vince Young scoring 5 TDs and setting a record for most all purpose yards in the Rose Bowl.  

Means Didly-poo. 

 

So does tripping ass first into the Playoffs, losing, keeping the same QBs, and keeping the coach who did "ok".

  • Pie 6
  • Flames 5
  • Poo 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really anything. I never liked trading up but it’s the way to go at this point. When we got cam, a losing team was deliberate.  The Panthers seem to be destined to be kings of the shitpile. Which means  no hope. If it can only consist of two firsts that’d be great -we have plenty of 2/3s to give them. 
 

this isn’t to say draft one just because but if everyone believes in one of them, do it.

Edited by onmyown
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per the chart, it would be our 1st and 3rd staying at #8. Win this putrid division and drop to #19 and it becomes our 1st, 2nd, and another late rounder.

That's just per the chart. Some of these trades for high picks to take QBs in recent years might mean the chart gets tossed out the window. It might depend on how far they're willing to slide down the board. At #8 they'd still be in prime position to land an impact player. They might not even be looking to slide all the way back to #19 unless it's a huge offer.

For reference, the Niners traded three 1sts and a 3rd to move from #12 to #3 to take Trey Lance. Per the chart, it should've only taken their 1st, 3rd, and maybe a late rounder to sweeten the pot. But when the pick is gonna be a QB and the phones are ringing just throw the chart out the window. The Dolphins still have another 1st coming their way from that trade this year. Meanwhile, Trey Lance has hardly played. He's only thrown 102 passes in the NFL.

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Per the chart, it would be our 1st and 3rd staying at #8. Win this putrid division and drop to #19 and it becomes our 1st, 2nd, and another late rounder.

That's just per the chart. Some of these trades for high picks to take QBs in recent years might mean the chart gets tossed out the window. It might depend on how far they're willing to slide down the board. At #8 they'd still be in prime position to land an impact player. They might not even be looking to slide all the way back to #19 unless it's a huge offer.

For reference, the Niners traded three 1sts and a 3rd to love from #12 to #3 to take Trey Lance. Per the chart, it should've only taken their 1st, 3rd, and maybe a late rounder to sweeten the pot. But when the pick is gonna be a QB and the phones are ringing just throw the chart out the window.

 

Yea that chart doesn’t mean much for top picks. Charts do not factor in competition, only worth.

It’s hard to tell but I think 8, next year’s first and this years second is minimum. Add in either this years’ third or next years second and it becomes more realistic.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Yea that chart doesn’t mean much for top picks. Charts do not factor in competition, only worth.

It’s hard to tell but I think 8, next year’s first and this years second is minimum. Add in either this years’ third or next years second and it becomes more realistic.

Im not opposed to it, but you gotta be certain. He's gotta blow you away in the interviews and whiteboard work. That's the crucial part of the equation that us fans get virtually no insight into.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...