Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Bucs GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

Should be rooting for SF to lose in the first round. Better draft picks for the Panthers.

If Brady is smart, he announces before the playoffs start that this is his last season. NFL will stop at nothing to give him a going away ring. One final magical ride. Brady overcoming all and winning his 8th Super Bowl as his final act.

....then change his mind in like March and do it all again next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

Unsatisfied with 25 years of mostly mediocre play, the Panthers invent a new way to lose today. Fumbled snap on a punt and can't even tackle a punter. 

Also, with three damn timeouts, why the hell didn't they kick it deep. Set themselves up to not NEED AN ONSIDE KICK...and still onside kick it. That last drive gets a lot closer to the end zone if you're not starting at the 10.

Wilks botched the end of that game in a way that only a Panthers coach could.

This is correct.  I assumed when they hung on to the three timeouts and kicked the quick FG that was what they were going to do.  Wilks is really poor with analytics and clock management aspect of the game.  There have been other instances like that throughout the season.  

Playing without your two best corners, on the road against Brady, you go for the god damn first down on 4 an inches.  I am so dissapointed that WIlks could not see and understand that.  I still just do not understand that decision.  That single decison probably swuing the game anywhere from 10-17 points easily.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah we aren't a rookie QB away as it stands. Defense lost this game

Henderson is decent depth, Jackson is good but too small to take the daily beating you get in the NFL, and Horn is elite but apparently fragile. At this point, I want us to go defensive end and CB with her first two picks. Donald looks to be a decent game manager if we keep the line elite and I still believe in Corral. If I'm wrong, 2024 QB class looks better than 2023.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Where did you see me say Wilks is the guy to turn the team around?

To his credit, he did a remarkable job given the sh-t sandwich of a situation he was handed. I have a load of respect for him.

But did he earn the full time job?

I'm my opinion, no.

Fair, I took my frustration with the game and some of the general excuse making for Wilks out on you. My apologies. Wilks has done admirably and I have a lot of respect for how quickly he turned our culture around. I’m just extremely tired of being terrible. Being average isn’t really ideal either and I think that’d be our ceiling with Wilks. I want the organization to stride for better than what I believe he’s capable of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

Henderson is decent depth, Jackson is good but too small to take the daily beating you get in the NFL, and Horn is elite but apparently fragile. At this point, I want us to go defensive end and CB with her first two picks. Donald looks to be a decent game manager if we keep the line elite and I still believe in Corral. If I'm wrong, 2024 QB class looks better than 2023.

Yeah Levis isn't gonna beat out Darnold anytime soon. I'd go D-line,CB, or WR if we're picking around 8ish considering the list of day 1 starters available. Maybe that TE from ND. Just need a day 1 immediate impact player and there's plenty of positions we can upgrade at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah Levis isn't gonna beat out Darnold anytime soon. I'd go D-line,CB, or WR if we're picking around 8ish considering the list of day 1 starters available. Maybe that TE from ND. Just need a day 1 immediate impact player and there's plenty of positions we can upgrade at

I haven't watched any college ball and don't dig into the draft until the season is over, which I guess it is now. So I don't know actual players yet but we need help at cb, lb, and de more than quarterback at this point. Especially if we keep Wilkes as HC. He's a strong defense/good enough offense kind of coach like we've always had.

BTW... I still think tremble can be a pass catching te.

Edited by shaqattaq
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, stirs said:

How does that work?

Remember the CMC trade?

Quote

Carolina Panthers trade RB Christian McCaffrey to the San Francisco 49ers for 2023 second, third, and fourth-round picks and 2024 fifth round pick

The further the 49ers go in the playoffs, the worse it is for the Panthers' new picks.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...