Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

Yep and by winning over the locker room he means allowing vets to get extensions they haven’t earned while having no real expectations of playing meaningful ball. The locker room needs to worry about winning over the new HC. Not the other way around. 

Edited by RJK
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

Seattle didn’t count ?
Detroit didn’t count ?

Tampa didn’t count ?

I get you don’t like Wilks and that’s ok but give him his due. The previous coach had a $64 million contract and left a trail of poo miles long 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

That is true. If Wilks has not done enough to get a fair shot here after what he's been able to do for this organization I doubt he will get one anywhere. I've always been a pretty staunch critic of Wilks defensive approach.  So I have mixed feelings about him as head coach. But I do not own the team. If I did I would give him a shot on morality alone. I would not give 2 $hits what the fans think. This entire situation just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m over “caring” about the HC feel good stories. Heck I’m sick of moral wins. I want this team to put winning first above everything else! I get the feel goods, but it feels better to beat the other team by 40 & then put your foot on their throats and punch them in their face one more time!! I want to have a HC & team mindset that is we plan to beat you even when you’re down! Who is THAT HC?? 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Former Broncos coach Vic Fangio could be in play as a defensive boss if Johnson is the choice as a potential successor to the fired Lovie Smith.

I’m not sure what the connection is but yes please.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That is true. If Wilks has not done enough to get a fair shot here after what he's been able to do for this organization I doubt he will get one anywhere. I've always been a pretty staunch critic of Wilks defensive approach.  So I have mixed feelings about him as head coach. But I do not own the team. If I did I would give him a shot on morality alone. I would not give 2 $hits what the fans think. This entire situation just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. 

It would stink to have to cut Wilks loose. I am very torn. I could be convinced to keep Wilks and pair him with stud coordinators. However, the thought of a fresh offensively-minded HC is exciting. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LaMelo to Brooklyn for Nic Claxton, Drake Powell, and a pick.  Who says no? 
    • Appreciate you, brother!  I know it was lengthy, but I felt whoever actually read it would appreciate it.
    • Damn good take, brother.  I think I take that poo personally because (sidebar: I don’t like to use narcissist often because social media has made it a buzzword and diluted the meaning, so when I use it, I don’t take it lightly) I grew up in a home with a raging narcissist, then married a narcissist and just came out of a divorce after a 20 year marriage with her, where afterwards she met and married another narcissist.🤣  And in my dealings with them, over my 41 years on this earth, at times I took great delight in breaking down their arguments point by point and forcing them to either acknowledge their wrongs and take ownership of them or watch them yammer and stammer away when they ran out of lies and excuses.  At various points, that was extremely satisfying, but ultimately, which I’ve realized especially after the last 3 years and going through the divorce and everything, it does NOTHING to them.  It doesn’t affect them one way or another.  For a logical, reasonable, grounded person, you would think calling them in their poo will bring it to their attention when they’re face when nothing but facts and truth and force them to change, but nope.  Not in the slightest.  They just disassociate from the ones who do that and find more people who will validate their behaviors and thinking.  poo pisses me off because they’re so destructive and couldn’t care less so long as their needs are met.
×
×
  • Create New...