Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you want to get the #1 pick from the Bears, what's your move?


EgoDogg
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy had his best play here. Darnold had his best play here. Mayfield was the only one who didn't. DJ has put up good stats despite trash at QB. It baffles me how much of this fanbase doesn't comprehend this.

 

Teddy played better in NO and Sams bar wasn’t very high. Moore is not a game changing WR so he is definitely expendable for a franchise QB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Teddy played better in NO and Sams bar wasn’t very high. Moore is not a game changing WR so he is definitely expendable for a franchise QB 

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

I don't think this about people wanting to trade D.J. Moore, but about what Chicago will want.

I personally would much rather go back to the Cam days of having terrible receivers, but a great (potentially) quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

WR are coming out in droves putting up 1000 yard seasons as rookies if I can add Moore to get our QB I’m doing it all day

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading into spot for Young or Stroud would be too expensive, Levis could fall to 9 anyway (seeing this more and more in mocks), and no way in hell you give anything away to go after AR.  I would take Levis at 9 (25% chance) or AR with our first second round pick (10% or less chance).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This place is bananas. We had the PERFECT chance to have the resources to trade up with little harm to our future ... but we didn't do it. Instead, we traded away our best player for peanuts. We also had the perfect chance to just let things fall as the may and we could have drafted at the top of the pile and had to give up nothing. But now? Now some of you actually want to trade away future for a top pick?

Idiot Facepalm GIF

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...