Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilks / Fitterer Season Ending Presser


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Oh man buckle up

They’re going to go for it this offseason after listening to Fitterer

Not sure why he shared as much as he did but sounds like they’ll blow a good chunk of future cap space and draft assets taking their shots 

Vertical WR, TE with speed, LB, pass rusher opposite of Burns, ballhawk at the backend. 
 

Not that anyone thought he was staying but to make a few splashy signings/picks this offseason then hand the keys to Wilks would be like pairing Cam Newton up with Shula all over again

The question is what is Fitt's definition of "going for it"?

We could end up being underwhelmed....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not sure what to make of this...

I wasn't quite sure he meant it this way (probably going to have to go back and re-listen to be certain) but he did mention her name when he was talking about it 😕

After that I tried to look up Nicole Tepper to see what her background is.  There is nothing.  Nothing about education, career, even her birthdate is a mystery.  We know Dave does not know what he is doing...please tell me there will be some football people in the room!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not sure what to make of this...

I wasn't quite sure he meant it this way (probably going to have to go back and re-listen to be certain) but he did mention her name when he was talking about it 😕

I guess Dave wants her input too.  Obviously she won't have the final say, but it's odd Dave is having his wife sit in on the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not sure what to make of this...

I wasn't quite sure he meant it this way (probably going to have to go back and re-listen to be certain) but he did mention her name when he was talking about it 😕

Hopefully it's only to tell Dave when to shut up.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not gonna be a large group of interviews...

That's kinda surprising.

We’ve had a pretty good head start after firing Rhule. I’m sure they’ve used the time for extensive background checking and researching to narrow down which candidates they want to bring in.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not sure what to make of this...

I wasn't quite sure he meant it this way (probably going to have to go back and re-listen to be certain) but he did mention her name when he was talking about it 😕

I think it is a good thing. She wouldn’t hesitate to call Dave out if needed. I think she wants to make sure the whole Rhule thing doesn’t happen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...