Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would this be considered tanking?


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's just a poorly run team. They don't have to tank they just have to be themselves.

Even if they get a great QB they will still run him into the ground. I wonder if we will ever see another Manning type move where a prospect says 'nope' again. They really should sometimes...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I like Jeff Saturday a lot (UNC) but it was a mistake to make him the head coach and he should not be retained. Mind boggling move from Irsay. 

if it was a decision made after 1pm it's pretty much the result of him being drunk. after 2pm it's the result of him doing coke. afternoons are not the time that he should be making any decisions.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It's just a poorly run team. They don't have to tank they just have to be themselves.

 

13 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Never chalk up to malice what is probably just incompetence.

Both are absolutely true.  As I have said to the "we should tank" crowd, you can never engineer more losses than some bad teams naturally will produce. 

For the umpteenth time, the year the Dolphins went all-in on tanking, they wound up drafting fifth, not first. It just doesn't work out the way people think.

This clip has a Three Stooges look to it.  All they needed was for someone in blue to pick the ball up and run it into the wrong end zone.  You really can't orchestrate this level of buffoonery.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All good solids points. I think after the RB and LB, is kicker the next spot among "Legacy" panther spot?? Kasay, gano, butkler, Eddie(best all-time %), Slye, Lloyd the touch back god, Mare, lols.....  Fitz...*right now* feels a combo of all the best panther ones. With the new rules, Fitz is either first or second in starting field position form KOs. He's a weapon and ten yards do matter. 
    • "Plays well" vs "near historic performance" are pretty different things. It's important to keep in mind the Cowboys passing defense is league worst and their run defense is nearly so, for sure. But one of those two players vastly outperformed what most other players have done versus the Cowboys and the other had fewer yards than typical (but still played very well imo, and did all we needed him to). Rico pretty much doubled up virtually every other single back that has played the Cowboys.  So yeah I get why people would be surprised that Rico is so far down the list of O players.
    • Trevin and Rozeboom remind me (obviously at a smaller scale) of when they had Beason as the mic and Luke beside him. Luke looked very average and was out of position a lot until he swapped to mic. REALLY hoping this is another case of that. Just on eye test alone that swap has been a night and day difference. 
×
×
  • Create New...