Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers in violation of NFL rules regarding their search for a permanent head coach, multiple sources tell CBS Sports.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It’s not an hour. They bring an agency in to coach you and then spend time quizzing you and “certifying” you .
 

Just adding context so people understand that this isn’t some online quiz. It’s a process.

Tepper sent the bill to Rock Hill and when he found out they weren't picking up the tab he was just like, "Well, fug it. We aren't doing that poo then."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

So she is too lazy or entitled to do the little things, spend an hour of her day, but she is qualified to hire a new head coach? What a train wreck this team is 

Who says she knew and didn't complete it? I'm not saying you're 100% wrong and Tepper has been a total clown to date, but the failure could easily be organizational vs her personally.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Following a request for comment, a team spokesman said in a statement: "She was trained prior to participating in interviews." No further elaboration was given.

Multiple sources have refuted the Panthers' statement.

lol.  Oh we did “other training”.   What clowns.  Just say you didn’t do it and will get it done.  Tepper sounding like my middle schooler. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

lol.  Oh we did “other training”.   What clowns.  Just say you didn’t do it and will get it done.  Tepper sounding like my middle schooler. 

She could still could be trained in diversity hiring… that’s not a lie. It’s the fact that they didn’t use one of the NFL’s partnered agencies. That’s where the NFL is fining them.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL sucks balls god damn. 
 

2011-2018: The only team with a minority head coach and minority quarterback 

2018: Owner says a no-no word and gets the entire team taken from him

2019: New guy guts the team and replaces the coach and quarterback with white people with no personality 

2019-2022: Team eats poo, new minority head coach as interim

2023: Has a woman as a leading decision maker in the hiring process, but can’t make a hire until we interview enough black people (interim coach doesn’t count cause, yknow, that’d be racist?)

Some asshole getting paid a 6-digit salary with the job title “league inclusion officer”: woah woah woah, you didn’t complete your inclusive hiring training bro? u some kinda racist? you have to interview the coaches the way WE tell you to or ELSE!!!

 

At a certain point this has to get demeaning to minorities but this probably isn’t the best place for that discussion heh

  • Pie 8
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

She could still could be trained in diversity hiring… that’s not a lie. It’s the fact that they didn’t use one of the NFL’s partnered agencies. That’s where the NFL is fining them.

lol.  What it is, is just bologna.  They were called out for not doing the league required training.  You either did it or you didn’t.   Issuing a statement that she was in fact trained is politician type BS.   It’s irrelevant to the fact at hand.  

It doesn’t matter if she did other training.  it’s like the league saying you have to pee in a cup for them. You don’t.  When called on it you claim you totally did….at home by yourself and it looked good. 
 

Big deal? Not really.  Not by itself.  But there is a pattern with Tepper at this point.   That’s the point.  We are poorly run in lots of ways. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...