Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With our second pick in the draft…


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

As someone who played TE in college it is much easier to get open as a TE than it is as a WR.

 

You shouldn't be comparing TE's to WR's as they are completely different positions. TE's don't get jammed like WR's do on a consistent basis. TE are facing slower LB's. It's so easy for TE's to find a zone in a defense.

 

It's why the position is becoming more of a threat to a offense. Im glad these guys are getting more attention as they can become huge threats to any offense.

I don't disagree that finding holes in zones may be easier for TEs. Still, how many teams have tight ends as their leading receivers? Looks like just KC and Baltimore. 

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

Dalton Kincaid from Utah is better than Both. 

Washington is gonna be an extra OT that maybe catches a first down or TD a couple times a year. Kincaid isn't gonna block. Both are more like a why not take them in the 3rd if they're sitting there kinda guys. I'd go DE or Josh Downs/Jalin Hyatt. There is a decent chance our dumbass Rhule/Mcadoo  combo had no idea how to use Tremble or Ricci, and wasted reps of Thomas/Sullivan for that stupid 4 TE rotation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Washington is gonna be an extra OT that maybe catches a first down or TD a couple times a year. Kincaid isn't gonna block. Both are more like a why not take them in the 3rd if they're sitting there kinda guys. I'd go DE or Josh Downs/Jalin Hyatt. There is a decent chance our dumbass Rhule/Mcadoo  combo had no idea how to use Tremble or Ricci, and wasted reps of Thomas/Sullivan for that stupid 4 TE rotation

Ian Thomas is already that big mf from Georgia 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

So what I'm getting here is that :

 

Getting a Tight-End should be the play with our 2nd Pick?

It’s shaping up to be a very good TE draft but certain teams and peeps don’t value them highly. We’ll see. I guess it will Al depend on our new HC and scheme. 

A guy to keep tabs on is Schoonmaker as a late 2nd to 3rd rounder. He’s got skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the trade here won't happen, but...... If we could work our way up to #5 and grab a QB.....

Free Agency:  Find a bridge QB, TE, and resign Boz/Foreman, and a veteran DT.

We need a DE, CB, and LB depth out of this draft.  If Williams is healthy he can compete for the #2-3 CB.  Move Chinn back to OLB.  Start the T'oo T'oo train.  Joseph is a heady safety, Tippmann is the perfect IOL for us.  Can play center, but also 6'6 315lbs, can play G or RT as well. Having him and Mayes provides great depth at the interior.  Schoonmaker is a perfect blocking TE, but I would also throw a bag at either Irv Smith Jr. or Gilseki during free agency.  Cut Ian Thomas and Eflin.  The rest of our picks provide quality depth.  McIntosh could be a legit homerun threat at RB.

image.thumb.png.5f4867c8a371549e6301c6c8905ee774.png

image.png

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've just seen enough highly touted prospects who pretty much everyone was high on end up busting to assume anything.
    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
×
×
  • Create New...