Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Coach Thread 2: Electric Boogaloo


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Regarding Wilks, I know we'll acknowledge the Bucs, Steelers, & Bengals games as stinkers but are we ever going to bring up whatever the hell that Rams game was on his interim debut?  Sure, even more difficult with a week turnaround from being a position coach (after being out of the league for 2 years) to HC down multiple staff, but what even was that game? Felt like he was instructed to showcase CMC and avoid scoring.   We still had McAdoo and our offensive all well in-tact.  The offense was unchanged and that game happened.   

It would bum me out beyond belief if he's the choice.  It's not even a safe choice, in his 30+ year career, he's been a DC for a grand total of 2 seasons at the NFL level.  A HC/IHC for 1 1/2 with mixed results.  And bottom line--it's not just that he's from Rivera's staff.  He followed Ron from CHI to SD to QC for 15+ years.  He was his AHC, helped run Tuesday-Thursdays.  They are as tight as it gets and it would feel like this weird offshoot/extension of that era I want no part of anymore.  Time to move on.  

 

I thought they were seriously trying to tank while watching that Rams game. 

Because that’s what it looked like

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I don't really want Wilks to be the HC but I can't pin the Ram's game on him. They had just fired Rhule and Snow, that is a significant shakeup to the team. Still trying to get his footing that game. He gets a pass from me there. 

The Pittsburgh, Bucs 2, Baltimore, and Bengals we all got outcoached.

Just realized we got swept by the AFCN this season, closest game being the one rhule coached. If Wilks' team identity was tough and physical, then the division to prove that against was the AFCN and we failed miserably at that. 

The Pittsburgh game was the worst

They hyped it up all week long, “protect the bank” etc., playoff talk and then they came out and proceeded to allow Pittsburgh walk the ball down their throats. 

Pittsburgh had some ridiculously long drives that game. It was truly painful to watch. Pickett had got hurt the week prior and they had to stick Trubisky back in there and Wilks had no answer for what seemed like an obvious game plan 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the canidates:

1-Steichen - Easily the frontrunner.  If this doesn't happen, it will indeed be a sad place

2-Kafka - Called a bad game against Gannon's squad, but I think the talent disparity became a reality as well.  Still seems to have a ton of potential.  

3-Reich - I don't think he's as iffy as a choice as he's made out to be.  He's won a SB as an OC beating BB/TB12, had some good years in Indy with a bad QB situation, and this past season just stunk to high heaven with too much Irsay influence. I'd be a bit hesitant but this could grow on me.  

4-Evero - I don't think he's necessarily out of the picture or simply a Rooney Rule interview.  Maybe he impressed, but being a DC I'm not hugely in favor.   

5a/b-Moore/Dorsey - Not the most popular at the moment.  They seem more products of the environment than curators of the environment.  Still young, would take a bit more time to warm up to if either happens.

The Discard/Just Don't see it happening crowd: Payton, Caldwell

*WILDCARD: Ryans

Demeco postponing so many of his interviews makes me think we still may target bringing him in house once logistics make sense.  Honestly, the top-3 this entire time may have been Johnson/Steichen/Ryans.  Those three were the original rumored, they were/are the most hyped by a combination of insiders and reporters.

The only real report on the matter was the following:

Quote

According to Mike Kaye of The Charlotte Observer, Carolina will not host the 38-year-old for an interview—in person or through video conference—due to logistical issues. The two sides could, however, reengage at some point further down the line.

We may just have to be patient.  Steichen and/or Ryans still may likely be the target.  

 

Edited by Bear Hands
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I don't really want Wilks to be the HC but I can't pin the Ram's game on him. They had just fired Rhule and Snow, that is a significant shakeup to the team. Still trying to get his footing that game. He gets a pass from me there. 

The Pittsburgh, Bucs 2, Baltimore, and Bengals we all got outcoached.

Just realized we got swept by the AFCN this season, closest game being the one rhule coached. If Wilks' team identity was tough and physical, then the division to prove that against was the AFCN and we failed miserably at that. 

Yeah I'm not saying that's all on him, but that game was just so strange.  Something felt weird about it but maybe it was a mix of the uncertainty and certain players knowing they were being shopped.  Just felt strange as hell.  

It's not "on" him necessarily.  He not only got thrust in from being our DC coach to HC, but was out of the league the prior 2 years.  This would be quite a catapult for him back into a HC position.  Think that's the reality of why he's not really being interviewed elsewhere.  He wasn't even actively coaching in 2020 and was the DC of a 6-7 Mizzou team in 21.

Edited by Bear Hands
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, frankw said:

Just spare us the spiel and admit your personal bar for the head coaching position is simply being marginally better than Matt Rhule and as or more conservative on gamedays than pre Riverboat Rivera. It isn't 2003 or 2011 anymore. Adapt or get run over is the way of the league. Last I checked the facts say Wilks team still has some cleat marks from the Super Bowl contenders the Bengals running us over. Cope more.

Basically the response I expected. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

The Pittsburgh, Bucs 2, Baltimore, and Bengals we all got outcoached.

This line for some reason stuck out to me.... at what point is there a line to outcoached and outplayed.  One is about decision making at the highest level of the roster while the other is the talent on the field isnt doing their job. Of course you can blame the latter on the coach as well, but how much of it is really in the coaches hands?

For instance, a QB throwing a pick .... is that the coach's fault? or The Steelers game where Chinn had his worst half of the season by constantly being out of position or not setting the edge when tasked as the OLB on the Najee Harris TD run...

 

You chose those games above... and outcoached doesnt really stick out to me.... We went into those games with a gameplan and if it was executed we would have won (except for Bengals... we got punched in the. mouth). 

 

Steelers game.. both teams had identical gameplans... but the talent gap on the field was apparent.

Baltimore game... we were in it the entire way... but Baker just couldnt see over the LOS

Bengals game..... we had PJ starting and he gave up the ball twice in our own territory...I will give it outcoached though.... 

Bucs 2.... we werent outcoached.... we were pathetic on the outside perimeter against Evans. The rest of the game we played the football we wanted to play.

 

To me... outcoached is when the opposing team introduces a gameplan that you can't counter because you werent ready for it. Talent gap plays a huge role in this... 3 of those games... the opposing teams didnt do anything special to beat us... in the end we beat ourselves (irony) with dumb turnovers and less than ideal play by our corners.

 

Just my two cents.

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Yet Wilks didn't do it when it mattered.

Without Wilks the situation wouldn’t have even mattered.  
 

It’s okay to have some nuance and admit the man did a good job while also having moments that pissed you off. 
 

It’s like this place is salty we didn’t make the playoffs, and it’s John Fox Wilks to blame. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

4-Evero - I don't think he's necessarily out of the picture or simply a Rooney Rule interview.  Maybe he impressed, but being a DC I'm not hugely in favor.   

He has coached offense before.  Depends on his plan for offensive coaching.  Apparently he is impressive.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

The Pittsburgh game was the worst

They hyped it up all week long, “protect the bank” etc., playoff talk and then they came out and proceeded to allow Pittsburgh walk the ball down their throats. 

Pittsburgh had some ridiculously long drives that game. It was truly painful to watch. Pickett had got hurt the week prior and they had to stick Trubisky back in there and Wilks had no answer for what seemed like an obvious game plan 

Yeah the protect the bank talk and all the being from Charlotte talk is just fluff at the end of the day. Nothing wrong with that when you're trying to give your fanbase hope. But we have heard it before and the results thereafter are all that matters. Hopefully the powers that be hire the coach with the best offensive plan.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

This line for some reason stuck out to me.... at what point is there a line to outcoached and outplayed.  One is about decision making at the highest level of the roster while the other is the talent on the field isnt doing their job. Of course you can blame the latter on the coach as well, but how much of it is really in the coaches hands?

For instance, a QB throwing a pick .... is that the coach's fault? or The Steelers game where Chinn had his worst half of the season by constantly being out of position or not setting the edge when tasked as the OLB on the Najee Harris TD run...

 

You chose those games above... and outcoached doesnt really stick out to me.... We went into those games with a gameplan and if it was executed we would have won (except for Bengals... we got punched in the. mouth). 

 

Steelers game.. both teams had identical gameplans... but the talent gap on the field was apparent.

Baltimore game... we were in it the entire way... but Baker just couldnt see over the LOS

Bengals game..... we had PJ starting and he gave up the ball twice in our own territory...I will give it outcoached though.... 

Bucs 2.... we werent outcoached.... we were pathetic on the outside perimeter against Evans. The rest of the game we played the football we wanted to play.

 

To me... outcoached is when the opposing team introduces a gameplan that you can't counter because you werent ready for it. Talent gap plays a huge role in this... 3 of those games... the opposing teams didnt do anything special to beat us... in the end we beat ourselves (irony) with dumb turnovers and less than ideal play by our corners.

 

Just my two cents.

 

Counter Argument:

Steelers: They had their backup in Trubisky starting and we let them methodically march down the field letting them do whatever they wanted multiple times. Wasn't so much the team wasn't executing, that to me says the gameplan was weak.

Baltimore: Sure, that was a close one and we just didn't have the gas in the tank in terms of talent to take us home. Defense played really well that game.

Bengals: Woof

Bucs: 3 times we let Mike Evans score long TDs on the right side of the field while one on one with no help over the top. If that doesn't scream inability to adapt, I don't know what does. 

  • Pie 6
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...