Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching Interviews: Round Two


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ForJimmy said:

You don’t see one in this draft? They have been predicting 3-4 could be gone before we pick at 9. It’s almost certain 2 will be gone. 

Doesn't make them Franchise QBs.  Hell, Zack Wilson went No. 2 and Trey Lance #3 and are they franchise QBs.   Just because they are predicted to go early doesn't make them Franchise QBs.  Just means teams are desperate for a QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

He'll be great at that. Former QB, former QB coach, former HC.

Who was he the QB coach for? I know he did it for veteran Peyton Manning which doesn’t seem to mean much. He had Wentz and Foles looking great in Philadelphia with the Eagles as their OC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

You don’t see one in this draft? They have been predicting 3-4 could be gone before we pick at 9. It’s almost certain 2 will be gone. 

Every ranking I've seen has only 2 qb's going before we pick at 9. Depending on which one you choose to use we either get Stroud or Levis at 9. I think everyone needs to chill on the trade up talk.

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Lady Cowboy Fan has already indicated that she'll be pissed off at me if the Panthers take Moore away from the Cowboys 😬

There's a few (very knowledgeable) Eagles fans on the Canes board I go on - they think he's an incredible OC and want him out of the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Doesn't make them Franchise QBs.  Hell, Zack Wilson went No. 2 and Trey Lance #3 and are they franchise QBs.   Just because they are predicted to go early doesn't make them Franchise QBs.  Just means teams are desperate for a QB. 

Teams are desperate for a QB every single year.

including last year.

Wilson and Lance went that high because they had that high a grade plus had the tools/traits.

vs last year, the league showed just what they thought of those QBs with most falling to the 3rd before anyone would touch them.

there’s a reason this exact time last year before pro days etc.  everyone drooled over Young and Stroud telling everyone they’d be Top 5 in last years draft if eligible.  Kind of the same way people are drooling over Maye and Williams this year after 1 season.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI: As I understand it, the comment about Shane Steichen is just an observation. It's not confirmed that the Panthers want a second interview with him.

As Mike Kaye pointed out though, if the team continues into the weekend without making a hire, It could indicate they're waiting on Steichen.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't know why they tried to run it again after the TO.

Then again, when I saw the pass, I did immediately think that wasn't where Dak was probably supposed to go with the ball.

Imagine watching that happen with a Cowboy fan at your side 😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...