Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?


t96
 Share

Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?  

164 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?



Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

thats where the conversation starts to get to 1.  The niners gave up 3 to move to 3.   No way the bears go back 8 spots for only 2 firsts

Part of the reason I thought the Burns trade actually made some sense. More 1st round picks to give up if we needed to move. Obviously you want to keep an edge rusher, but without a QB, edge rusher isn't going to lead you to the playoffs, much less a SB. Before we start getting serious about trades, I want to see who we get as an OC. That's going to be very telling about the type of QB we try to acquire. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

BS speculation by Rigley.  How can he KNOW that Fitt, Morgan, the scouting staff AND Reich are all in on CJ?  CJ may very well be worth trading up for, but Rigley is just throwing spaghetti against the wall to see if it sticks.

Its not his speculation. He is reporting what Allbright said. Allbright also said earlier this week TEPPER loves Stroud for context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Its not his speculation. He is reporting what Allbright said. Allbright also said earlier this week TEPPER loves Stroud for context.

Distinction without a difference.  Same question: How can Albright KNOW that Fitt, Morgan, the scouting staff, Tepper AND Reich are all in on CJ?

Edited by bythenbrs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Moving to one from 9 would look something like this: 2023:1rst, 2nd  2024:1rst 3rd  2024: 1rst

Thats a lot

Yeah I wouldn't want to trade more than next year's 1st and a 2nd/3rd this year.  3 firsts is just too much for an unproven QB....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the first 3 picks will be defensive players this time. At least that's how the draft is falling this year. I would not be shocked at all if our 1st pick is the number one safety in the draft. It appears he will be right there for the taking. 
    • Man oh man. That 8-9 record without a playoff berth puts at 13 if I recall, ahead of both Atlanta and TB with their 8-9 records, due to our weaker SOS.   We might have been in range to deal for that guy. I hope he doesn’t last to 8. And I hope some AFC team picks him. 
    • Cool. I am not wanting to debate or argue it. It is mostly my preferences. But a couple of things:  I just don’t think he sees the middle of the field well. But besides that I would rather spend a 1st round pick at different offensive positions if we went offense, otherwise we have neglected defense something fierce the last few years. Last 1st rounder was Horn. That’s like 5 years ago now.   Investments… gee the last 4 drafts we have used a 2, a 2, a low 1st and a top ten pick on WR. Bryce has been here three years, three of those picks were specifically for him.  And assets, I don’t think you are counting the haul we gave for the QB position. That counts and it was huge.   Add that up and add the Burns cap space we freed up when we traded him. We bought two guards and used the savings on them. Not on the defense.  I mean, that is a lot of investment in the offense when you put all that in a sack and weigh it.    peace. Appreciate your post.   
×
×
  • Create New...