Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Revisiting the CMC Trade

WarHeel

By WarHeel,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

chbright Mentor

chbright

Posted
Posted

It's a fair RB class again this year. There isn't really another CMC, but a committee can give you a lot of it. It was a light trade, I chuckled over talk of almost a 1st at the time round these parts. The better SF does the lower that 2nd sinks and while the aggregate of the picks might be close, the odds to nab top talent shrink as the draft and goes more towards JAG talent vs top talent like a CMC..............

It's still not as bad as the non trade with the rams for burns.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RevJ Community Regular

RevJ

Posted
Posted
On 1/27/2023 at 6:57 PM, WarHeel said:

Tell me Burns should be gone without telling me Burns should be gone.

The Rams should have added even more value to their ridiculous attempt to jettison more picks so they could have obtained a flashy yet overrated player. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Cornerback

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I noticed that we did not seem to be too worried about CB, although I really like the CBs we added (draft and undrafted signings).  However, we can't go into the season with an injury prone CB, a 33-year old nickel, and a free agent, former seventh rounder.  Even if Gilmore is used sparingly until we have an injury to Horn or Jackson, we need another veteran. I think both Willie Drew and Smith-Wade have a good chance of making the roster, and I don't think rolling with six CBs is ridiculous in this day and age. Morgan was focused on Offense and, as you recall, pounded the table for Dane Jackson in Buffalo in round seven.  He seems to have found a pair of gems yesterday, but they take time.  They fit a "type" (good tackling, versatile). I also think Gilmore might be good for Clowney as well.  To your point--if we sign Gilmore, I feel very positive about the CB room.  If Horn stays healthy, it would be a strength and not a liability.
    • 45catfan
      2024 Draft: Day 3 (Rounds 4-7)

      By 45catfan · Posted

      Kinda have to be a jack of all trades when your starting spot just got handed to someone else.  You try your best at what is asked of of you by your employer in a different role or be looking for work elsewhere.
    • strato
      How short a leash will Young be on?

      By strato · Posted

      Well wait. They are building a team as we speak to cater to a under equipped player’s deficiencies. Put a little differently they are overbuilding it to compensate for the design flaws of a weak component.  No one would design an NFL QB with Bryce Young as their template.  No. One.  It is always around this point that I get really pissed off or frustrated and lose the thought or point I am going for, because I look at it and realize that what I just wrote, is 100000% true.   So I lost the point again. Sorry 45. I get so pissed off at the decision makers that put this on us. It isn’t about whether Young is a good kid. Doesn’t matter. Besides that he has no underdog cred, at all, and that is the only reason I’d have to ignore my good sense. 
×
×
  • Create New...