Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: CJ Stroud is reportedly the “apple” of the Carolina Panthers’ eye at the moment.


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, stan786 said:

Free Agency will show us a lot with QB roulette.  Most think the Lions and Seahawks are going to stick with what they have but you never know.

Ideally the Colts love of Levis is real and we could move up to 5 for Stroud but i'm sure the QB rumors will swap ten times before we get to the draft.

Levis does seem like Irsay's ideal QB, I hope that's how it goes down. Seattle is keeping Geno so they're not desperate, they may wanna swap and take Defense or AR as a project QB

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Levis does seem like Irsay's ideal QB, I hope that's how it goes down. Seattle is keeping Geno so they're not desperate, they may wanna swap and take Defense or AR as a project QB

I honestly have no clue what to expect out of the Colts at QB. Their last two highly drafted QBs were two of the most slam dunk no brainer #1 overall picks in the last quarter of a century. Trevor Lawrence is probably the only other one in the mix.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BrisbanePanther said:

This has been an entertaining back and forth.

For the record, I'd trade Burns in a flash if it guaranteed my choice of QB and reduced the price of future picks.

Yes, he's a 24 y.o. pass rusher with all sorts of value today. Then, before the ink is dry on his extension this forum will see him as a 25/26 y.o. millstone on the cap and therefore the team's future.

He'll then be traded for a 5th rounder and this same forum will say good riddance...all while still debating on whether Arch Manning is worth trading up for in the draft because we still somehow have too many holes (again).

Or worse, he has a mediocre season next year, Tepper then balks at his asking price and Chicago pays him what he wants with all their cap room Peppers style. Then he leaves and Carolina has nothing to show for it other than an expanded search for a new DE and QB.

 

So cynical.

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This report also originated from a podcast Benjamin Albright was one where he said he thought Steichen was who we were hiring, mere hours before it came out that we weren't even interviewing Steichen again.

I do think Stroud fits what Reich wants as well as anyone, so I can see it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

No

This team still has too many holes to give up that many picks to move up for a guy that isn't anything close to a sure thing, particularly with how deep next year's QB class is.  If one of the top 3 falls to us, or if we can move up a couple of picks without giving up our 2nd's this year or 1st next year, then you do that.  

But anything else just isn't worth it with this class, next year should have at least 2 if not 3 QB's who would be rated above any QB in this year's draft, and another couple who would all challenge to be top 10 picks this year.

I'd so much rather fill our holes this year, then next year trade away multiple 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round picks as needed to move up for a much better QB prospect.

 

13 hours ago, Skack25 said:

Hard pass on Levis and Richardson.  If we can't get Stroud, just roll with Sam or Corral.

Stroud is the only draftable QB for us in the this draft.  Honestly, I would rather go get someone like Gardenr Minshew as a place holder to battle with Corral for this upcoming season than force a pick, let alone a trade for Levis or AR15.

If we cannot get Stroud for a reasonable price; remember we still need an edge rusher, MLB, TE, and CB, we should trade back in the first and acquire an additional 1st for next year.  If we had two first round picks next year we could easily trade up towards the top of the draft with a Godfather package while having enough cap space to build out our roster holes with Free Agents.

I'm more sold on a group of Caleb Williams or Drake Mayes than I am of Stroud, Young, Levis, Richardson.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya know I am beginning to think the people who said we should have kept Rhule until we secured our draft pick instead of firing him as soon as we did may of had a point in hindsight. 
Panthers are gonna need to just bite the bullet no matter the price or, as some said, trade down, get another first round pick and go all in for a QB no matter where we draft next year. 
Whenever we draft a QB it is gonna hurt financially for a while. But hopefully pays off in the long term. 
This division is ripe for the taking if we can solve our QB problem. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, WOW!! said:

There was a report we loved Levi’s a few weeks so scratch his name off the list as well.. lmao

No, no, no.  You don't understand how this works.  Once you scratch a new name off the list, the previous name scratched off the list comes back.  So when we scratch off Stroud, Levis comes back.  Next, we will talk about trading up for Young, so he gets scratched off and Stroud comes back. 

The loop gets closed the Tuesday before the draft starts when we talk about wanting Jaek Haener of Fresno State. Then whoever we talked about wanting before that comes back, leaving us with Young, Stroud, Levis, Richardson, McKee, Hooker, and having thrown everyone of the scent.....including ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Ya know I am beginning to think the people who said we should have kept Rhule until we secured our draft pick instead of firing him as soon as we did may of had a point in hindsight. 
Panthers are gonna need to just bite the bullet no matter the price or, as some said, trade down, get another first round pick and go all in for a QB no matter where we draft next year. 
Whenever we draft a QB it is gonna hurt financially for a while. But hopefully pays off in the long term. 
This division is ripe for the taking if we can solve our QB problem. 

This was my argument. Don't get me wrong, I was relieved when Rhule was fired just because then we knew that terrible was officially going to end but I was saying that once you decided to retain him you might as well see it through and get that top 5 maybe top 3 pick out of it. Bonus points for avoiding the criticism for not hiring Wilks.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

All these years and almost no one understands this...

Yeah I think a lot of the trade up poo is teams trying to inflate the price because they know that Washington, Carolina, Tampa, New Orleans, Atlanta, Indy, Houston, NYJ, and Tennessee all need QBs and there’s not enough of a QB market for everyone to get somebody.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, poster also said Young or Mahomes, it would have made no difference.  If there was way to actually test that hypothetical, I would sell every belonging I have and wager that Mahomes would indeed yield different results.  Mahomes automatically changes the D coverages.  He automatically changes the threats.  He attacks and threatens a field different vastly different.   We have seen good QBs and great QBs play behind horrific OLs in a single season....and they don't default into being the worst team in the NFL.  Frank Reich was old, stubborn and not creative enough to deal with an anomaly QB like Bryce.  The best QB in the NFL wouldn't be handicapping Frank, they would be enhancing Frank.  Starting week 1, Frank didn't even trust Bryce with basics....Frank gave him I what I feel comfortable with you being able to do offense.  Which took throws and plays off the table because Bryce couldn't do early on what a bad vet in Dalton could.  Mahomes would not yield the same results. 
    • All I have to say to this really, is it sounds nice and downgrades Stroud to make Young look better is more like what this take does. Look at the WR numbers the year before and then the year with Stroud. He made them better, not the other way around. That’s my opinion. I appreciate you designating that it was yours. Many state these things as facts.
    • but what if.....and here me out....the pro Bryce Young stuff was coming from people under Fitterer.  You know, the people who are employed to feed him that input.  And they happen to all still be employed here.  when Rhule was fired I desperately wanted Fitterer fired.  It set things up for Fitterer to be the sacrificial lamb the next time things went poorly....every time we move on from a disaster, we are retaining a heavy % of the folks who helped bring the disaster we are "moving on from".  Everyone argued Fitterer probably could be great and it was all Rhule.  We are just repeating the same stuff to a degree IMO.   Panthers needed a clean slate post Rhule era.  Needed another post Frank era.  Things were just too bad or too dysfunctional IMO to be salvaging so much.   We keep failing to do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...