Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Amazing how people still think Darnold is a starter in this league. He is not. He is a backup. He sucks. 
It was very obvious he made our offense very limited and that Saints game was absolutely putrid. Which  Darnold supporters seem to forget. 
Darnold is done and if this team resigns him after how atrocious he was with us. I have reason to believe that that the Panthers FO is run by morons. 
Also Darnold was not solid. He was the very definition of a backup QB. Good for 3 or 4 games and then the wheels fall off. 

It is the strangest thing on the planet to have a following and be such a bad player. 

I will never understand how some people still see him as anything but what he is, one of the worst starting QB's we have ever had. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

… but the dude pretty much did everything we could ask of any non-top 10 QB the other 5 games he played. And that's with an absolute moron calling plays for us on offense...

Interesting coincidence that Sam played his best ball for us in a year when our OL finally looked NFL ready.  I’m not really sure what one has to do with the other.  I’ll think on that some more.

DFF76889-9026-422E-A0BC-90E4D17F5FE5.jpeg

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

It is the strangest thing on the planet to have a following and be such a bad player. 

I will never understand how some people still see him as anything but what he is, one of the worst starting QB's we have ever had. 

Bridge, not long term answer.  Substitute Minshew or Brissett if you prefer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, panthers55 said:

So he had a bad game that we won. Truth is he went 4-2 and managed the game well. He made throws and moved the chains. Even with the Saints game he averaged scoring 24 points a game during that stretch which was above the NFL average. And that was coming off IR playing for McAdoo. His quarterback rating was 92 with a couple of games over 100. He was more than serviceable and had Horne played in the Tampa game he would have taken us to the playoffs. You can dislike him all you want but his play was not the problem at the end of the year.  Should be interesting to see what Reich thinks about him.

Delusional Darnold fans are always funny because in the end we all know how this will end. Darnold will fail. 
QBR is a terrible stat and if you look at his stats during those games it is unimpressive. 
We may of won the Saints game but Darnold was putrid, that is the Darnold we will see if he starts for us next year. Even Reich can’t make a diamond out of poo.  

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Shocker said:

I hear you but if we can’t one of the top 2 QBs I would seriously resign Sam and wait.  Our team can get great with these picks and I ain’t done with Sam.  

how long do we wait? sam isn't the future. we can't act like he might be. 

take a chance on one or two of the QBs from this year and keep trying until we find the guy. it's the most important position on the team. you might think that we don't need to do anything until we find the perfect guy, but if we keep waiting for all the stars to align and Cam 2.0 falls into out laps, we're going to be waiting a very long time. 

We don't need to settle.

we DO need to keep swinging, and that's including this year. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...