Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#1 CJ Trade


razorwolf
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just a question to anyone. 
 

I’ve read different places about what the colts would probably have to give up to move to #1 (23: 1st, 2nd, 5th; 24: 1st), but I figure the bears are going to want more draft capital than that! But if the bears would accept a offer of that magnitude I’d think I’d be willing to give up (2) 1st (23’ & 24’), 2nd (62), and 5th (148) to move up to #1! What is your opinion on this scenario?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, razorwolf said:

Okay I just wanted to hear other’s opinions. I don’t know about trading up, and then if the guy we want is gone then try to trade with another team back to later pick to regain draft capital.

Trading up without knowing your guy is certain to be there is not realistic.  If you get stuck there after giving up a ton of picks without getting your guy will get everyone fired.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This comes down to what you think of our scouts and Fitt. When Fitt sat down with his scouts to discuss Sam Darnold they talked him up like he could be our long term answer at QB, and then Fitt picked up Sam's 5th year option. They lost their credibility in evaluating QBs the moment Sam came out of the tunnel and pooped the bed. 

At this point we obviously are going to continue to rely on Fitt and our scouts rather than firing them, but i don't want them using extra ammo to trade up for a QB. We need our 2024 first round pick in case their QB selection in 2023 is poop. Also, Frank brought in QBs to the Colts and they pooped the bed as well, so no extra ammo for Frank either.

The smart play is to stay put and see which QB falls to the 9th pick. If no one does, then Corral starts, or go get a vet. If Corral poops the bed, then Fitt needs to go, and the scouts with him who were wanting Corral. Then in 2024 you have a new GM and scouts pick a new QB in the first round if possible.

Letting Fitt panic and throw away multiple high draft picks on a QB who he isn't qualified to evaluate is madness. Fitt doesn't have the credibility. His decisions point to him being unqualified to evaluate veteran and college QBs, and his scouts as well. Putting this on Rhule is a cop out. 

The way I look at this situation is that Fitt will select one more QB, and that is his last shot. I want that last shot to be one 1st round pick, and nothing more. The 2024 and 2025 high draft picks need to be protected.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

2 firsts and then filler picks I would do, but I think we will be asked to bend over farther than that.

I could live with that if you were pretty sure you were actually going to get a franchise QB.

We'd be basically swapping picks in round one.

We'd lose a #2, but we actually have an extra one b/c of the Christian trade to SF. They'd probably insist on the higher of the two.

We'd lose Our 5th round pick, which is our lowest pick in the draft.

We'd lose our #1 for next year. All the other picks would remain for 2024 and our portion of the deal would be complete.

I could like with that if we absolutely knew had a franchise guy headed our way.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherj said:

This comes down to what you think of our scouts and Fitt. When Fitt sat down with his scouts to discuss Sam Darnold they talked him up like he could be our long term answer at QB, and then Fitt picked up Sam's 5th year option. They lost their credibility in evaluating QBs the moment Sam came out of the tunnel and pooped the bed. 

At this point we obviously are going to continue to rely on Fitt and our scouts rather than firing them, but i don't want them using extra ammo to trade up for a QB. We need our 2024 first round pick in case their QB selection in 2023 is poop. Also, Frank brought in QBs to the Colts and they pooped the bed as well, so no extra ammo for Frank either.

The smart play is to stay put and see which QB falls to the 9th pick. If no one does, then Corral starts, or go get a vet. If Corral poops the bed, then Fitt needs to go, and the scouts with him who were wanting Corral. Then in 2024 you have a new GM and scouts pick a new QB in the first round if possible.

Letting Fitt panic and throw away multiple high draft picks on a QB who he isn't qualified to evaluate is madness. Fitt doesn't have the credibility. His decisions point to him being unqualified to evaluate veteran and college QBs, and his scouts as well. Putting this on Rhule is a cop out. 

The way I look at this situation is that Fitt will select one more QB, and that is his last shot. I want that last shot to be one 1st round pick, and nothing more. The 2024 and 2025 high draft picks need to be protected.

Was the scouting revamp before or after the Darnold trade? I don't remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Luciu5 said:

Was the scouting revamp before or after the Darnold trade? I don't remember.

If we have new scouts, then I wouldn't be as opposed to trading up. Then again, Corral looked like a complete dumpster fire from what I saw in preseason. New scouts would make me feel better though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are confident in our staff

and our staff likes him (including the guy who will be his position coach and been around the league a bit, comparing him to Joe Burrow)

then the 3 1sts plus some to move up for him is worth it.


 

QB is the most important position in All of sports.  And if you get a good one on a rookie deal.  It’s worth it’s weight in gold.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...