Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top contenders for QB's in the draft


panther4life
 Share

Recommended Posts

Draft position of teams MOST in need of a QB are bolded

1. Bears, no need unless they decide to trade Fields

2. Texans , Davis Mills was not good enough to preclude them from spending this pick on a QB. 

3.Cardinals( they are married to Murray and 0 threat to draft a QB, but possibly a great trade partner)

4. Colts, after hiring Steichen who helped groom Hurts, surely they must be eyeing a QB here. Could they try and jump their division rival and move up all the way to 1? I would if I were them.

5. Seahawks, Possibly. We will know more once we see what kind of deal they sign Geno Smith too, if at all.

6. Lions, seems unlikely. 2 more years on Goff's deal and Ben Johnson stayed for a reason.

7. Raiders, Clearly after releasing Carr and reports of being cash poor, a rookie QB here or using this pick to move up makes a ton of sense. 

8. Falcons, Right now they lead the rumor mill in the Lamar Jackson trade potential. They have the cap space to sign him to a mega deal, so maybe there's something there? MHS831 already pointed out, this would just put the Ravens in a place to take a QB with this pick and give them additional ammo to move up.

9. Panthers Finally here we are. We may have a slight advantage over the Falcons in a trade up scenario as have 40 and 62. Their 2nd round pick is 45.

-------------------

11. Titans, Yes they are behind us, but if anyone falls, they might like to jump us.  This is also Tannenhill's last year of his deal there, so we will see if they extend him.

13. Jets, Who knows what their plans are but again someone within range to potentially trade 

My quick thoughts.

Texans likely won't trade down but may try to secure number 1 overall if price isn't too steep, as a defensive approach from having the Colts (or anyone really)jump them.

Cardinals seem like the absolute most likely trade down candidate but how far would they be willing to go?

If no trades happen through 3, Colts can stay right there and have the 2nd QB selected, or possibly even 1st if the Texans miraculously pass one.

Raiders are a wildcard and do crazy things, but safe to assume they would look strongly at QB at 7 if they don't trade up.

Lastly, I don't even know if it's possible for us to move up to the 1-3 range if other teams are offering a lower 1st this year and similar future compensation. I think I would be ok with trading 9, 62, 2024 1st and 2025 1st if that got us to number 1 so we can have the QB of our choice. If were talking trading to 3, then that would have to be a draft day decision imo because, 1 and 2 could easily be back to back QB's.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is ok to voice an opinion, but when half of the QBs drafted in the first round bust and few second rounders ever produce, it is because GMs and their scouts can't predict NFL success for college QBs that effectively.  So please do not call someone "dumb" for having an opinion that differs from yours.  This aint middle school (or maybe it could be).

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

It is ok to voice an opinion, but when half of the QBs drafted in the first round bust and few second rounders ever produce, it is because GMs and their scouts can't predict NFL success for college QBs that effectively.  So please do not call someone "dumb" for having an opinion that differs from yours.  This aint middle school (or maybe it could be).

Glad it's not me who has to make this choice.  For these guys, this choice will determine the next several years for them.  Whew!

I hope that if they trade up: we strike gold.  I really want that.  I have no idea what's going to happen, but maybe getting our character coach guy will move us closer to 55% instead of just 50%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

… when half of the QBs drafted in the first round bust and few second rounders ever produce, it is because GMs and their scouts can't predict NFL success for college QBs that effectively. 

This.  After the underwear Olympics, there are no surprises on ‘measurables’ but, the interview process to understand what goes on inside the head and heart of draft candidate is a very inexact science.  How do you score and grade the ‘intangibles’ that often define the difference between Delhomme and Darnold?  You could do an entire thread on intangibles and still struggle to define what characteristics equate to long term out performance.

And for those who reject going with a retread, I have a one word refutation: Delhomme.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bythenbrs said:

This.  After the underwear Olympics, there are no surprises on ‘measurables’ but, the interview process to understand what goes on inside the head and heart of draft candidate is a very inexact science.  How do you score and grade the ‘intangibles’ that often define the difference between Delhomme and Darnold?  You could do an entire thread on intangibles and still struggle to define what characteristics equate to long term out performance.

And for those who reject going with a retread, I have a one word refutation: Delhomme.  

I'm thinking Brian Decker may be able to help with parsing out the intangibles.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the top prospects will not be who the media is saying they are. There will be a few surprises that no one saw coming. It happens in every draft.

Every year has the Clelin Ferrell, Andrew Thomas, Stingley, Solomon Thomas types who has solid R1 grades on publications and then climbs to the top come pick time. 

This year, I’m thinking that’s Broderick Jones and Devon Witherspoon.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the surprise trade up will be from the Titans.

The AFCSouth is a lot like the NFCSouth in that there is a real shortage of capable QBs. Jacksonville moved ahead of the pack this season (thanks greatly to a coaching change) and now the Titans, Colts and Texans are all in chase mode. Note how high in the draft both the Colts and Texans are... for best choice they are going to have to wheel and deal, perhaps really mortgage the farm to find something that can take some of the warmth away from Vrabel's seat.

The NFCSouth has four teams with no decent QBs, so much so that Sam Darnold would probably be the best out of the bunch if it went ahead as is (if he were resigned). However, it's just Atlanta and Carolina in the top 10 picks, with the Saints and Bucs pinched a bit by placement, resources and cap space.

I'd still prefer to see us grab BPA at 9, or even trade back, and try to get a solid QB prospect on day two. However, I'm looking at our coaching staff and thinking that if they see their man, I'll cheer their pick and applaud their wisdom. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...