Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

S2 Cognitive test points to NFL Success


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Now this is very interesting. I'd be more convinced if they would publish scores, allowing us to see actual correlations. But, just accepting their information, it sounds like this is something that deserves serious consideration.

i can understand wanting to keep the scores secret, but as long as we know the rankings, especially compared to other years, i think it's something we really need to be paying attention to. 

 

and then combine this with whatever our new data guy, George Li has put together for the QB search and i think we should have all the info we need to give this coaching team so they can pick the best guy to carry this team into the future. 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i can understand wanting to keep the scores secret, but as long as we know the rankings, especially compared to other years, i think it's something we really need to be paying attention to. 

Yeah, NFLPA would never go for that.

Even with the best of intentions, you know once the scores got out it'd be all over sports media that "Star Player X scored low on his cognitive test".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is this a reaction time test to visual stimuli? 
 

If so, were the subjects tested multiple times on different days or just once?

You really need an average score over many testing sessions to gauge each subjects performance. 
 

However a test calculating speed while making the correct decision with multiple stimuli in play is a hell of a lot better and relevant than a wonderlic.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, NFLPA would never go for that.

Even with the best of intentions, you know once the scores got out it'd be all over sports media that "Star Player X scored low on his cognitive test".

How is that any different than the Wonderlic scores though?

Both would demonstrate a form of intelligence processing, granted on differing facets, which can be a measurable standard to help a team in their decision on drafting a player. Unless there's something in the paywall article that's vastly different to the comments I've read here?

Edited by Raskle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Raskle said:

How is that any different than the Wonderlic scores though?

Both would demonstrate a form of intelligence processing, granted on differing facets, which can be a measurable standard to help a team in their decision on drafting a player. Unless there's something in the paywall article that's vastly different to the comments I've read here?

There are people who think those scores shouldn't be made public either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is truth and evidence behind this S2 test. QB requires a person to make smart, quick, and accurate decisions with limited info. I do believe this is what separates an avg QB from an elite QB. Zach Wilson, Darnold, Mayfield all have the physical talent to play QB but do they have mental fortitude to execute it? Watch Bryce Young's tape and he has it, that's why I'm not so worried about his size, he'll know how to get he ball out quick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

There are people who think those scores shouldn't be made public either.

I think it's ridiculous to keep these scores private. I hate standardized testing but what's the difference when colleges ask for SAT/ACT scores? Or med school/law school not accepting you because of low scores? It's all to judge your "intelligence." Fair or not fair, it's how the process works. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ummm.... We not including shutouts...?
    • Sometimes, reddit actually does deliver... There's always one, though...
    • So after watching (or tried to watch) Night 1 of Wrestlemania 42, I concluded on a few things: 1) WWE partnering with ESPN/Disney is by far the worst move WWE could had made. They either needed to stay on Peacock or simply switched over to Netflix for all of their PLEs because tonight's broadcast on the ESPN + app was absolutely terrible. I couldn't go 5 seconds without a buffer due to everyone trying to stream the show at once and you would think that WWE and ESPN would realize this before going into Wrestlemania weekend but yet still allowed this issue to keep occuring. Not only that but I backed out of the show and tried to see if that fixed the issue but realized that because of the buffering, it basically "paused" the show and I ended up being several minutes behind so once I got back in, the match had already ended and the magic was ruined by their stupid issue. 2) The ads.. the motha f'n ads... If it ain't greedy enough for both WWE and ESPN to steal our money but to force us to watch 5 minutes of ads after each match is absolutely ridiculous. You already have our money with all the streaming services and also with ticket sales, and with merchandise and the advertising for companies on their turnbuckles and ring mats... But yeah, let's throw in even more trash commercials to force it down our throats. I get they do it for RAW too on Netflix but is sad that both streaming services force live events to have commercials when really it should be commercial free. 3) Really, in the end, it was a lackluster 1st night and pretty predictable. For them to hype this show this much, I expected better. Literally, the only surprises for Night 1 was Paige returning and maybe the return of Bron Breaker but outside of that, it was pretty bad.    Ok... I am done ranting. Maybe I will feel better after a good night's sleep 😂      
×
×
  • Create New...