Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DARNOLD


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/1/2023 at 12:59 PM, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Tepper didn't devote a small fortune to hiring this all-star coaching staff only to watch Sam Darnold become Panthers Plan A.

no.   He hired this all-star coaching staff to make the best FOOTBALL DECISIONS.

If they feel that Sam is the best football decision, he really can't b*tch about it as this is the job he hired them to do and poured his money into.

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Josh McCown may be in Frank's ear, folks.....

 

18 hours ago, bythenbrs said:

If the Panthers re-sign Darnold, the Huddle will have a collective aneurysm.

ED0CFA5B-1B93-4131-A6F4-EB5641B2099C.jpeg

I want this to happen if only to see the meltdown here.

Watching the world burn is so. much. FUN.   😈

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

no.   He hired this all-star coaching staff to make the best FOOTBALL DECISIONS.

If they feel that Sam is the best football decision, he really can't b*tch about it as this is the job he hired them to do and poured his money into.

Haha, if Darnold is designated the Panthers starting QB this season, something has gone terribly wrong.

As a backup?

Yeah, I could see our coaching staff trying to help Sam improve his abilities while holding a clipboard during the games on Sunday. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Haha, if Darnold is designated the Panthers starting QB this season, something has gone terribly wrong.

As a backup?

Yeah, I could see our coaching staff trying to help Sam improve his abilities while holding a clipboard during the games on Sunday. 

yeah...that's what I actually meant.  lol

But seriously, IF (big IF) they sign him to be a backup or Bridge, he will get every opportunity to start because we would not have a ready-to-go QB unless we want to do to our drafted rookie QB what the Jets did to Sam as a rookie and that is toss him to the wolves.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

no.   He hired this all-star coaching staff to make the best FOOTBALL DECISIONS.

 

David Tepper is still here.  Fitterer is still here.  Front office is largely still intact.   One that has repeatedly done very stupid things.  Are they all suddenly cured simply because they hired a new HC? Going out and throwing cash at a bunch of the best names available for your coaching staff....doesn't mean everyone in Charlotte is cured from doing dumb things. 

I mean, this is basically the same repeated narrative that always gets applied for every coach and new era.   Including the really bad ones.   

NFL folks do dumb stuff.  We have seen that repeatedly here and all over the league.   This whole don't dare question a profession that constantly employees people from top to bottom that does dumb stuff is old. 

I'll judge the new era based on what they do at QB.   Until then, jury remains out. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

yeah...that's what I actually meant.  lol

But seriously, IF (big IF) they sign him to be a backup or Bridge, he will get every opportunity to start because we would not have a ready-to-go QB unless we want to do to our drafted rookie QB what the Jets did to Sam as a rookie and that is toss him to the wolves.

Physically Sam appears to be everything a team could want in a starting QB.

Mentally he seems a tick too slow and easy to rattle.

I'm not sure Sam's issues can be overcome with better coaching, but if they can, this staff probably has as good a chance as any.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, travisura said:

I commented on a post where the OP compared Darnold to Jared Goff, and directly implied that he'd be good enough to lead a turn around, and potentially even a super bowl. This is not a monster of my own creation.

I guess this far in I didn’t realize you were talking to OP. That’s my bad. 
 

I still think that Darnold being “the guy” is a very rare opinion though lol. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

I guess this far in I didn’t realize you were talking to OP. That’s my bad. 
 

I still think that Darnold being “the guy” is a very rare opinion though lol. 

Well, it was to OP as well as all the other folks in here who are adamant he's a good QB that just hasn't had the right circumstances. 

It probably is just a vocal few who believe he should be starting. But I don't even think he's adequate to be a bridge vet. But I suppose reasonable people can disagree on that point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

Taysom Hill and Blaine Gabbert had the best QB ratings in the NFL last year   

you generally won't find them or Sam Darnold listed and tracked on most sites because he and they didn't play enough.  And when you barely play, the results get skewed significantly vs the field.   So they exclude them from even showing because of that. 

You don't ignore it.  You also can't take a number like that a face value.  

This makes zero sense lol.  The QB rating is a composite score that is simply calculated from all of the individual conventional QB metrics: passing yards, attempts, completions, TDs, INTs.  If your argument is that Darnold didn't play enough to consider his QB rating, then can you explain why his completion percentage is fair game?  How does his lack of playing time skew one and not the other, when one is calculated from the other?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

This makes zero sense lol.  The QB rating is a composite score that is simply calculated from all of the individual conventional QB metrics: passing yards, attempts, completions, TDs, INTs.  If your argument is that Darnold didn't play enough to consider his QB rating, then can you explain why his completion percentage is fair game?  How does his lack of playing time skew one and not the other, when one is calculated from the other?

CRA seems to have an "answer" to everything doesn't he?

He'd make a great Politician....or Used Car Salesman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MasterAwesome said:

This makes zero sense lol.  The QB rating is a composite score that is simply calculated from all of the individual conventional QB metrics: passing yards, attempts, completions, TDs, INTs.  If your argument is that Darnold didn't play enough to consider his QB rating, then can you explain why his completion percentage is fair game?  How does his lack of playing time skew one and not the other, when one is calculated from the other?

QB rating is repetition dependent to compare to the distribution of historical QB performances/limits.

Completion percentage is a measure of decision making. Who did you trust as a receiver? Did you go through your progressions? Did you choose to place the ball away from dangerous defenders and challenge the weaker defenders directly with one on one matchups. You know within 5 to 10 throws if the QB is making good decisions.

I scale a QBs decision making as a passer:  below 50% - poor; 50 to 60% - average; 60 to 65% - good; 65 to 70% - excellent; 70% or greater- elite. As a measure for overall passer rating, I will only include games that a QB has achieved at least 35 pass attempts. My minimum of 35 attempts in game is based on play balance for the greatest probability of a win. I also expect a QB to produce GWD and winning with pass attempts exceeding 40 is a strong indicator of a championship QB. Ex. Tom Brady has the most GWD and 76% of those GWD are 35 or more passes; 55% are 40 or more passes (and good to elite level decision making is indicated by the comp% in these GWDs).

Darnold is 4-15 in these games with ratings in the 30s/40s and comp% below 50%.  2 of his 5 GWD fall in these wins. None of his wins were greater than 25 pass attempts in 2022. His 1 GWD had 15 pass attempts with a comp% of 33%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...