Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ian Rapoport: Panthers likely to have interest in Jimmy Garoppolo


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not to bad ,In five-plus seasons with the 49ers, his stats aren't eye-popping. Garoppolo has completed 67.6 percent of his passes for 13,093 yards, 77 touchdowns, and 42 interceptions.

But his 35-17 record as a starter speaks for itself.

The Strange/interesting part is Garoppolo has the highest winning percentage of NFL quarterbacks with at least 10 starts since 1950 -- If you only factor in the version of Garoppolo who doesn't throw a touchdown pass. And the number of times that's happened isn't insignificant. The 49ers are 10-2 in those games, putting the winning percentage at .833.

Injuries have created a lot of what-ifs but Through the ups and downs Garoppolo also has been one of the most winning QBs against winning teams since entering the NFL.

Since entering the NFL in 2014, Jimmy Garoppolo is 13-10 (.565) against teams that finished the season with a winning record.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, NcPsa10 said:

Not to bad ,In five-plus seasons with the 49ers, his stats aren't eye-popping. Garoppolo has completed 67.6 percent of his passes for 13,093 yards, 77 touchdowns, and 42 interceptions.

But his 35-17 record as a starter speaks for itself.

The Strange/interesting part is Garoppolo has the highest winning percentage of NFL quarterbacks with at least 10 starts since 1950 -- If you only factor in the version of Garoppolo who doesn't throw a touchdown pass. And the number of times that's happened isn't insignificant. The 49ers are 10-2 in those games, putting the winning percentage at .833.

Injuries have created a lot of what-ifs but Through the ups and downs Garoppolo also has been one of the most winning QBs against winning teams since entering the NFL.

Since entering the NFL in 2014, Jimmy Garoppolo is 13-10 (.565) against teams that finished the season with a winning record.

 

 

 

I have never see a system as QB friendly as the 49ers. I mean it had Brock Purdy looking like an amazing QB. Yes Jimmy G has a winning record as QB. 
But you have to realize that it is because of the system he is in. 
He was responsible for them losing the Super Bowl and the 2022 NFC Championship. He has shown during big games a great capacity to choke. 
As people have pointed out if we did get him it should be a 1 or 2 year deal, but with a rookie being developed behind him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...