Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lombardi: Panthers trying to trade Corral. Can be had for a "ham sandwich"


SuperBowlBound
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I mean most teams don’t have 3 QBs on the roster. Eason won’t get snatched off our practice squad if we need an emergency one. 

I thought sorta like PJ walker did this year, Corral would force his way on team. Plus depending on the vet(like buttercup jimmyG) injury history, 3 may be the way. Panthers have room, this team isnt that close to a philly/49er roster. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I thought sorta like PJ walker did this year, Corral would force his way on team. Plus depending on the vet(like buttercup jimmyG) injury history, 3 may be the way. Panthers have room, this team isnt that close to a philly/49er roster. 

Brissett, rookie, and Eason on the practice squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Still doesn’t make sense to me. They aren’t going to find a QB3 cheaper with Corrals “upside”. He was never the answer to a starter, but he’s a better option than any QB3 they can get. 

The collective QB brain, must not be fans......who knows I still think lombardi is plugged in, but dont know for sure. 

I agree with you, cheap, young and "upside"......"NO THANKS" current staff???? I get that he may be rougher than than they like, but not to the point of releasing him or giving away for a 2027 7th. With the 3-4 and different O system, he could find himself in the rare player for player deal. Some 3rd team DE....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve seen Brissett thrown around a few times. At first I wasn’t fond of that idea, but I had forgotten that he’s played under Reich before. I am warming up to starting the season off with him and handing off to Richardson or Levis after some games. I don’t think we should sign him if our staff plans to go with Stroud or Young. Those guys should be out there game one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SuperBowlBound said:

I'm certainly in the camp that Rhule had most of the say but I'm not absolving Fitterer of anything. Frankly, the drafts have stunk. That's on everybody in the offices on Mint St.

Until Panthers draft performance improves, fans should remain justifiably skeptical of Scott Fitterer's performance as GM.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SuperBowlBound said:

the drafts have stunk.

Not calling you out specifically on this, but if our drafts have stunk, what does a good draft look like?

Needless to say, Overall I do not feel this way, at all. I'm genuinely curious what most folks expect from a draft class?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a guy just talking some poo/trying to be funny. 
 

If we trade him this fast, whether you like him or not, that’s an asinine waste of resources.
 

I think I’m just gonna ignore any public talk involving “panthers” and “qb”. It just seems like that’s the only talking point for the team, and every Tom, Dick, and Harry throws poo against the wall right now. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...