We’re trading for #1 pick !!!

[Varking]

I’m pretty sure I predicted like 99% of this trade exactly just a few weeks ago. Folks wanted to trade Burns and i said Chicago wouldn’t do that, but they’d likely take DJ, the firsts and the seconds. 

[*FreeFua*]

Including Moore allowed us to keep our 2nd instead of SF’s. Allowed us to keep our 1st in 2025 which is honestly pretty big. God forbid this thing goes south and after 2 years we’re stuck with a Zach Wilson. We’ll need that 1st rounder 

[SaltAndPepper]

OH MY GOD. STROUD IS CAROLINA BOUND. STROUD IS CAROLINA BOUND.

[Krovvy]

Just now, Kentucky Panther said:

I agree with you. I’m worried our dude isn’t going to have the weapons he needs to get started year one. Should have a good line at least. 

We have to immediately scout and take a shot at a receiver this year. Right now we just have developmental guys on the roster that may or may not pan out. Free agency is also an option, but it's going to be a bloodbath as so many teams need receivers.

[trucpfan]

15 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

all that cap space you saw freed up is 100% going to Boze and a FA WR. My guess is Theilen and whoever we draft at #39

The Ilene is very slow definitely not a good option anymore we need a young playmaker like DJ Shark.

[Skack25]

4 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

 

Because $$$$$$

[Eric4280]

I hope this board realizes what it means throwing from Marvin Harrison Jr, Garrett Wilson, Chris Olave, Jaxson Smith Njigba, and Emeka Egbuka in the big10.

to

Terrace Marshall, Shi Smith, Laviska Shanault in the nfl. This offense will have zero identity. Game breaker at rb? Lol no. Decent wr? Bottom five in the nfl. Star tight end? LOL. This is bogus.

[Harbingers]

Just now, Skack25 said:

Because $$$$$$

And the injury issue. 

[scpanther22]

DJ gonna need a whole new wardrobe lol

[WhoKnows]

19 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

We keep pick 39 and 2025s 1st.  But DJ essentially replaced that value.  

I mean, this is just wild.

We should have traded Burns before paying him $30M a year. The picks from the Rams would have been enough to trade up. Then we’d have all the picks we traded and Moore. I’d much rather have 2 2nds and a 1st and Moore than Burns at $30M.

[Carl Spackler]

Damn Bears give up 1 top pick and get a superstar WR, another top pick next year and more picks 

[TheBigKat]

Knowing we still have #39

 

we could parlay that back into a first next year

[Kentucky Panther]

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

I’m pretty sure I predicted like 99% of this trade exactly just a few weeks ago. Folks wanted to trade Burns and i said Chicago wouldn’t do that, but they’d likely take DJ, the firsts and the seconds. 

You think we get our guy?

[Carl Spackler]

Watch this be for Levis