Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter: Tepper likes Young, Reich likes Stroud


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Someone gets it.

 

Tepper should not be making football decisions. This is why you hire a staff let them handle that.

There is no evidence whatsoever that David Tepper has forced any deals since he has been owner.  He also wouldn’t agree to the huge guaranteed money to Watson so this is fake news.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

There is no evidence whatsoever that David Tepper has forced any deals since he has been owner.  He also wouldn’t agree to the huge guaranteed money to Watson so this is fake news.

Tepper was the driving force behind acquiring Watson. We did contract restructuring just to make cap room for the trade. When that fell apart we ended up with Baker as the consolation prize. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Tepper was the driving force behind acquiring Watson. We did contract restructuring just to make cap room for the trade. When that fell apart we ended up with Baker as the consolation prize. 

Valid, but he ultimately didn't force what would have been a terrible decision.

I've never been one of Tepper's biggest fans, but I wanna be fair to him at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I heard tepper was the one who convinced luke to retire. He also told the doctor to misdiagnose cam’s shoulder. He also paid Firestone to fug up cam’s truck tires so that his truck would flip.

 

let’s not forget, Tepper is the reason we signed Rodney peete!

Without Rodney Peete, does Delhomme ever get a shot? 🤔

Thanks Tep!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...