Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers to sign Miles Sanders


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

Huh

Foreman must've been asking for too much which is unfortunate because he was really good for us last year

Or he simply is a dual purpose RB with a tight connect to Staley.  Foreman and Hubbard are both largely one dimensional.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

So you like an injury prone RB who has no impact on the passing game. His backups would often times look a lot better than him when given the chance. Had the best run blocking o-line but still didn’t stand out much. Had 16 yards rushing in the SB.. Signed him to a 4 year deal which will look horrible in a few years. If you like this signing, more power to you bud. Sorry that I’m actual able to think for myself and be critical over a signing compared to a low iq sheep like you who jumps for joy no matter who we sign. 

He had 50 catches for 500 yards his rookie year. I’d say he can produce in the passing game just fine if called upon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he'll do good for us. I have to wonder about his blocking because Philly wasn't using him to the extent that I would've expected. He can be electric, especially if he gets in the open field. 

On an off note, I think some of you hate Chuba just because Rhule drafted him. He's underrated here. Yes, his hands aren't that great, but last season--you know, the season where we got an O-line--his average YPC was the same as Miles' (4.9).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Rags said:

Hi I watch a lot of teams play.

I know a lot of HBs struggle with pass protection and struggle with catching out the backfield.

A lot of those halfbacks don't run as well, nor have the production Sanders does. 

That's the difference. Sanders is good at football and has those areas as areas as of weakness. And still had 50 catches on 64 targets last year.

Nah that was his rookie year. He had 78 yards receiving last year, but he wasn’t asked to do that. He’s proven he can be a threat catching the ball if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What is your personal grade of this draft?
    • No disrespect intended, but you act as if we are supposed to value your opinion when it is all emotion and no fact.  The roster (I assume you mean offense) is "still trash" because someone who just signed up for the Huddle has declared it to be so?   Buhahaha.  ha.  Let me show you how FACTS work, and why emotional, unsupported opinions don't carry much weight: TE: Upgraded through the draft.  Sanders is a weapon that should improve the passing game and give Bryce an outlet he did not have last year. RB:  We just drafted the best RB in college football, one who can protect the passer, run the ball, and catch the ball like nobody else on the roster.  His knee will be cleared July 1.  OL: We just signed two of the best guards in football.  that is what Payton did to protect Brees.  Ekwonu has the skill and talent, he was simply missing technique.  We got him a better OL coach.  Center?  Bozeman was ineffective last year.  Corbett is an established veteran OLman.  It seems we are much better up front. WR:  We added a guy who gets open and has averaged about 900 yards per game as a #2 in Pittsburgh with an inferior QB there.  Thielen was a 1000 yard WR last season.  We have not had a #2 like XL, with his YAC capabilities and ability to catch contested passes.  In other words, the X is much better; the Z will be replaced with a stud WR, and the veteran slot will probably not be the #1 WR in 2024--he should be the #2 or even #3 most effective WR.  The 2023 Z WR, who had 418 yards and was showing signs of improving, will not be a starter in 2024.   As much as the OL has improved, we improved the weapons.  QB:  All of these additions increase levels of protection for the QB that he did not have last year and they give him more powerful weapons that he did not have last year.  Young will not be a rookie getting hammered trying to throw to people who are not separating.  This should make him improved.  How much? remains to be seen. Now keep in mind that we did this by not reworking contracts and kicking the can down the road.  We did not have a first rounder in the draft.  We added a second rounder to next year's draft.  We also addressed needs on defense as well, adding established DL, OLBs, ILBs, and DBs.  We get 2 first round pick starters who were injured most of the season back on that defense.  Yes, we lost Burns, Luvu, and a few others, but while being good players, they were either asking for too much money or they were not great fits for the system.  So the D should be better as well. That is not trash.   
×
×
  • Create New...