Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Natalie Miller (aka Verge): per her sources, Panthers moved up to #1 to take Bryce Young


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

If the site you’re using has a cashout option you could just dump a bunch of money on Young in anticipation of the odds shifting after tomorrow and then take a cashout 

I'll have to take your word for it.  I'm a poker player myself and its just for beer money.  Haven't played that in years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

No there isn’t.  Young is the better player and we all know it except you.  
 

Wait and Vegas.  

I like Stroud better, but even if Stroud’s arm strength is better it doesn’t make him better than Young. Young is a processor and playmaker with capable but not elite arm strength and there is nothing wrong with that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Shocker said:

No there isn’t.  Young is the better player and we all know it except you.  
 

Wait and Vegas.  

The poll results shows "we all" as in more of the Huddle believe Stroud is the better player. 

 

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/21/2023 at 10:41 AM, GOAT said:

this new era of wanna be twitter talking heads that write for some unknown sports blog just throwing poo at the wall and seeing what sticks is so annoying.

"the sources I know say ____"

if it hits, they get to retweet and add to their rep.

if it misses? not a peep. Remember the Deshaun Watson crap from this account?

"my source says it'll be today guys!"

claiming their "source" says Bryce is going number one is a really safe bet. that poo will probably stick.

this person had us taking Joey Porter Jr. in their first mock of the year just FYI.

let's work together and stop giving these sort of accounts the attention and credit they desire.

we're all out here just guessing.

I was pretty on point with the Watson stuff idk. People bring this up for some reason, that whole thing was a debacle. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/21/2023 at 10:41 AM, GOAT said:

this person had us taking Joey Porter Jr. in their first mock of the year just FYI.

let's work together and stop giving these sort of accounts the attention and credit they desire.

 

As I have explained previously, this was a no trade up mock and I was asked to make it interesting. I have never not had Carolina trading up for a quarterback. My mock 2.0 with trade ups I had them making the move to number one to take Young back in February. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, therealmjl said:

Young has a good enough arm to make all the throws, but Stroud was throwing dots today.

Yeah Young's arm is fine. His touch and accuracy are what separates him. The way he layers footballs on the move is unreal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, csx said:

The poll results shows "we all" as in more of the Huddle believe Stroud is the better player. 

 

That proves what?

Young is the better player. 

You banking on us, that includes the likes of me, to really know, yeah I'm telling you, Young is the pick ladies and gents. This guy just made it so.

The Huddle remind you, was happy with Darnold over Fields, js.

The Huddle was happy with Rhule's hire....js

The Huddle rather create a new thread instead of a reply to comment on CJ...js

50% want CJ, 18% want Young...28%(ontheDL Levis supporters scared to choose), and 3% want AR..1 % want Levis...smh

 

Edited by Bluetooth
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bluetooth said:

That proves what?

Young is the better player. 

You banking on us, that includes the likes of me, to really know, yeah I'm telling you, Young is the pick ladies and gents. This guy just made it so.

The Huddle remind you, was happy with Darnold over Fields, js.

The Huddle was happy with Rhule's hire....js

The Huddle rather create a new thread instead of a reply to comment on CJ...js

50% want CJ, 18% want Young...28%(ontheDL Levis supporters scared to choose), and 3% want AR..1 % want Levis...smh

 

It proves we all don't think what the person said we all think. In fact more people think the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are about 5-7 people in that building that see the actual draft board (which is electronic). It’s probably the most guarded thing in that building right now, anyone who says they know, is making an educated prediction. I can tell you from what I have seen there is much more hype around CJ Stroud from the staff.

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not necessarily trying to be flippant, but Morgan has been telling you what type of team he's trying to to build. So, if you have no idea, you just haven't been listening. @ForJimmy explained it pretty well. But, if you don't believe that, then all you have to do is go back and listen to all of the pressers since Morgan was promoted. Then go back and listen to Dave Canales' pressers since he's been here. Don't forget to listen to the pressers during the draft. You're complaining because you don't agree with the player---or perhaps players that were drafted, the mail one being X. I have consistently said that they should draft the player with the most upside, and that you can't limit your draft based upon perceived limitations (especially perceived limitations based upon some fans) of your QB, particularly if the QB is unproven. X has the most upside, and he needs to be developed for sure, but what you obviously fail to realize is that all of the receivers that we could've picked were "projects," save for maybe Ladd who is smallish, has an injury history, and would have offered some redundancy with what we already have. Most people consider him a slot guy. We already have guys that can play in the slot.  If anything, our choices in the draft probably mean that Mingo is solidly in the long term plans. Whether he succeeds or not will be on him for the most part, as well as the coaches to put him in his best position to succeed. Regarding that, he likely needs to be transitioned to the slot where I'm pretty sure some teams (the Steelers being one of them) would have placed him in had he been available. What we also have is JT Sanders who will be another tough competitor on our side at the catch point. He is big-bodied with high upside, and will provide even another potential beast in the second and third level, and another consistent option for our QB (and any QB).  Morgan and Canales obvious put a premium on receivers that can make tough catches, but that doesn't mean that these guys can't be polished up and coached up where necessary. But even if I look at a worse case scenario, if a wideout can make a tough catch, in the mold of Alshon Jeffrey or even Tee Higgins, then YAC is not as important. But the fact is, that both of our newly drafted wideouts have upside to be YAC monsters. So many people were banging the table for a center. I've said it all the way through: apparently our FO on down believes that AC can be a proficient center. It s not like he hasn't played it before. Moreover, we found out (and some of us already knew) that BC could be a backup. Well that's the plan. Until proven otherwise, I'm going to have faith that Canales and Joe Gilbert (as well as Dan Morgan) know what they're doing in that regard. I could be wrong, but I'm thinking that our O-line should at least be average. We'll find out, but I trust that this is not going to be an excuse for Bryce not to succeed in 2024. You've already seen the investment in the O-line, and in the offensive weapons. But Morgan also invested in the defense. We were decent last season, but inconsistent which lead to us being gashed. But the lack of offense also lead to the defense being gassed, which of course leads to being gashed as well. With the addition of the rookies and the additions of Robinson and Jewell, Fuller and of course Clowney and Wonnum, getting gashed in the run game will hopefully be a thing of the past. But the fact is that you can't fix everything in one offseason. However, if you can't see the plan and the vision, you just don't want to see it.   
    • I see it like this:  Can Coker beat out Terrace Marshall Jr?  Can Pinkey beat out Smith-Marsette (since Legette can return kicks) or Jonathan Mingo? I see Pinkney going to the PS for a season, but he will be pulled up if there is an injury--even if we stay healthy, in 2025, there will probably be two vacancies.  Not sure what Johnson is going to want $$$$, and Thielen will probably be done or cut.  Pinkney could then compete for a job, and with his height, he gives you that Tall red zone WR.   Worth keeping on the PS at the least.
    • I wouldn't you legit need 2-3 seasons too immediate post draft grades are one of the sports medias dumbest creations.
×
×
  • Create New...