Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign Chark


Panthers316
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Also I think Chicago is getting more pissed by the minute.  They thought they were getting a really high pick for next year.  
 

Not so fast.  While I don’t expect to be winning the SB next year. Winning the NFC South could be in the cards.  Every signing just drops the value of of that trade even more.  
 

And I don’t think we are done.  I don’t expect another big name but we still have plenty on money left.  I expect post draft holes to continue to be filled.  

Rookie qb teams still tend to be picking top 10 going into year 2

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It's 100% going to be a defensive guy... probably a safety, linebacker or EDGE. I just cant see a path where we go offense unless there is an absolute stud sitting there. 

I hope not a safety as they are sitting on the bench behind Woods and Bell. Edge or LB I am all for. Still think WR is in play with Chark only being one year deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:


 

 

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Jesus I just realized we will have a COMPLETELY different Offensive skill player starting lineup than last year. Like, no returning starters whatsoever it was completely overhauled.

Moore to Thielen

Anderson to Chark

Thomas to Hurst

CMC to Sanders

Baker to Rookie QB/Dalton for a few weeks

There are no prior pictures of the panthers 2023 starters in a panther uniform.  

 Yeah, it's crazy. I was thinking about this earlier as well. It's a ground up rebuild at the skill position and it's fuging insane to think how much different it's going to look. But you can tell there's real football evaluators making decisions this time. They said "Ok, O-line is a strength keep it intact, let's use these other assets to reform and mould exactly what we want."

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I can. Thielen is a 33 year old short term stopgap. Chark is an oft-injured talented guy on a one year prove it deal. Hurst is knocking on the door of 30 and can easily be cut after two seasons.

These FA signings are about short-term bandaids. The draft is about long-term solutions.

I would imagine that the offensive skill positions are very much on the table at #39.

Why am I getting this message when I try to message you?

 

You are only allowed to send 0 messages per day. Please try again later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I can. Thielen is a 33 year old short term stopgap. Chark is an oft-injured talented guy on a one year prove it deal. Hurst is knocking on the door of 30 and can easily be cut after two seasons.

These FA signings are about short-term bandaids. The draft is about long-term solutions.

I would imagine that the offensive skill positions are very much on the table at #39.

Yeah plus we still don't have any potential alpha #1 WR for this season. We could get that at #39. Thielen is a slot guy, Chark is a downfield threat as a solid 2nd WR but we still don't have that do-it-all #1. If the draft doesn't fall that way we can absolutely go BPA but if there's a WR sitting there with that #1 potential we absolutely will seriously consider him. Even if we take a guy and he doesn't turn out to be a #1, like you said both guys we signed are more stopgaps or prove-its, if we draft a guy who doesn't work out as #1 he could still be our longer term #2 or #3 option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a big fan of the signing myself, mainly because he can't stay healthy and it still doesn't give us a #1 WR for the rookie, would have preferred to overpay in a trade for Hopkins, Sutton, or Jeudy to be honest.

Also not thrilled at it being just 1 year unless it's super cheap at say like $3 million for the year, have a feeling it's going to be in the 6-7 range.  Would have rather done it for 2 with whatever we gave him being the guaranteed money so the cap hit could be split up.

But really, I just don't like the idea of giving the rookie a bunch of 2's and 3's at best as his WR room and I think this signing eliminates us from trying to trade for any of those #1's out there.

100% still need to use the 2nd rounder on a WR though, someone who could have breakout potential and to grow alongside the rookie QB for years to come.

  • Poo 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

PSA

 

I will be pooing every single baby chark doo doo doo post i see.  bunch of MFers thinking they are so origional and clever. i encourage yall to do the same

 

with all that said, im fugin stoked

 

THATS THE PICK ME UP I NEEDED BITCH

 

side note: I have Chark in all of my dynasty fantasy leagues.  always believed in him.  either injury or being stuck in the jags with shitty QB play and coaching have held him back. he has the opportunity of a lifetime here being our #1 with a damn good OL, supporting cast, coaching, scheme, and QB. 

 

hes about to go the fug off on that prove it deal

I'll take that challenge...

"It's CAT-SHARK"!!!!

 93d2b5fe3b8ea827282958eef37270b8.thumb.jpg.dcf0a64324719129a2b76e13749efd14.jpg

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They had best show out in Week 1 there are zero,I mean zero,  excuses for that offense  defense, haven’t play together yet and they still have Mr Soft and Predictable as DC  I expect break downs at times  …but that offense returns all starters except Tremble and both Mayes and Brady are veterans and can play LG and know the system not up for any participation awards this season they can save that practice energy for Jacksonville.     I’m sick of the, winning,  or looking competitive, when it doesn’t matter.   
    • There are some tough decisions that I'm eager to see the results of... Does Blackshear sneak on to the roster as RB4? Does the team go with 4 TEs or just 3 again? And has Mitchell Evans done enough to defend his roster spot from James Mitchell? Who is WR6 and is there a WR7? TMac, XL, Coker, and AT seem to be locks imo and I'm assuming Renfrow also makes it due to all of the camp praise. Who makes it between Brycen Tremayne, Jimmy Horn Jr, and David Moore? If the team goes with 7 WRs, which one of those three doesn't make it? Jacolby George and Emani Bailey both have not gotten a lot of game time. Could the Panthers be trying to hide them so that they can be stashed on the PS? Do they go with 10 OL instead of 9? Who makes it out of Walton, Carter, and Kingston? DL locks are DB, BB3, ARob, and Turk. That leaves Jaden Crumedy, Cam Jackson, Sam Roberts, Shy Tuttle, and LaBryan Ray all competing for the final 1 - 3 spots. Does DJ Johnson get IR'd and Thomas Incoom make the roster as EDGE5? What in the fuuuuuuuuuuuuck is going to happen at LB? Only locks are Wallace, Rozeboom, and Cherelus (Wallace has mentioned in media how Cherelus has been big bro for him on the team) seem to be locks. Rhattigan had some good moments against Houston, Martin-Scott is an SC guy, Krys Barnes has popped on defense and on special teams, and Windmon got time starting for the team last season. Are two of those guys going to make it or are the Panthers poaching from another team's cuts? CB5... who is it? Do they go with the 4 expected safeties or bring in a 5th? Has Ransom done enough to take the start from Nick Scott?
    • I had this discussion with my buddy yesterday afternoon. If we start this season very slow(especially with the schedule being what it is) and then "rally" in the second half to get to 4-7 wins, I am already gonna be pretty heated at the staff overall. I know we are a very bad roster but I am not gonna keep excusing these slow season starts WITH late season rallies. That's a coaching staff problem, IMO. It's more excusable to just stink gate to gate, IMO. At least you can understand why.
×
×
  • Create New...