Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers trade PK Zane Gonzalez


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, panfanman said:

My head is spinning.  What condition?  What round?  What pick swap?  If it's purely a round for round pick, say our 6th for their 6th, then then Fitts is REALLY betting on the Panthers.  

If Zane makes 80% of his attempts, we get their 3rd for our 6th.  If he kicks below 70%, we have to give them our 4th for their 7th.  If he gets injured, we have to give them our 5th for their 6th.    If Zane kicks more than 3 game winning FGs, we get their 4th for our 6th.  But if he misses 2 game winners then that reverses.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, panfanman said:

My head is spinning.  What condition?  What round?  What pick swap?  If it's purely a round for round pick, say our 6th for their 6th, then then Fitts is REALLY betting on the Panthers.  

Relax. It's a conditional late round pick situation. Not worth getting dizzy over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Smithers said:

If Zane makes 80% of his attempts, we get their 3rd for our 6th.  If he kicks below 70%, we have to give them our 4th for their 7th.  If he gets injured, we have to give them our 5th for their 6th.    If Zane kicks more than 3 game winning FGs, we get their 4th for our 6th.  But if he misses 2 game winners then that reverses.  

That maths

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, at the time that wouldn't have worked for them. The truth is that when they had the biggest advantage in that conversation was also when Notre Dame was at their peak arrogance and revenue stream creation(prior to the Longhorns Network, etc). Notre Dame was just never going to work out. The biggest thing they could have done is go hard AF and try to give insane deals to the premier Big 12 teams. Even then, most of them were eyeing the Big Ten and SEC. The biggest issue with the ACC was betting wrong. Miami and Virginia Tech ended up being disasters. Basically former college football powerhouses that ended up being afterthoughts by the time they arrived. I mean Miami specifically have literally had a total of three double digit win seasons since they joined the ACC in 2004 and two of those are in the past 2 seasons. Virginia Tech just fell apart at the wrong time, although I think Franklin will bring them back to prominence to an extent. Had we had it to do in hindsight, probably taking teams like TCU, Baylor, etc would have been wiser options than some of the moves into the Northeast and getting Miami.   But, ultimately, fug all this nonsense. It's the insane greed of college football that killed regional rivalries, college basketball and entire storied, REGIONAL conferences. That is the real blame. The thirst for the destruction of all college sports which sits squarely at the feet of the slobbering, ignorant rednecks and hillbillies at the top of the college football sphere.
    • Im wondering how long it will take me to turn the game off
×
×
  • Create New...