Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cap space update for all 32 teams


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/31/2023 at 5:38 PM, Soul Rebel said:

I'm guessing they've got $7-8M on the table for Floyd or Ngakoue. Maybe another $5-6M for a training camp cut CB and then ~ $10M for draft picks. Still gives us about $3-5M on the conservative side to float through the year, or roll over to '24. 

We need a little over $12 million for our draft picks based on the picks we have right now.

So have about $15 million in actual cap space at the moment, although technically we could eat into that amount we need to save for the rookies before they actually sign the deals and then get a Burns extension done to get the room back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2023 at 4:42 PM, Mr. Scot said:

Second only to the Bears...

(don't ask me how) 😳

 

How are there 4 teams with less than 2 million in cap, before the draft, and half the teams have less than 10 million. This league is heading towards a major cap crisis. The next negotiations aren’t going to be pretty. Edit: Actually before the next negotiations cause they are 10 year apparently. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harbingers said:

How are there 4 teams with less than 2 million in cap, before the draft, and half the teams have less than 10 million. This league is heading towards a major cap crisis. The next negotiations aren’t going to be pretty. Edit: Actually before the next negotiations cause they are 10 year apparently. 

I think large QB contracts are widespread now to the point other positions will feel the squeeze. Lots of 1 year deals for guys hoping for more somewhere next year. Next year may not be any better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2023 at 11:00 PM, tukafan21 said:

We need a little over $12 million for our draft picks based on the picks we have right now.

So have about $15 million in actual cap space at the moment, although technically we could eat into that amount we need to save for the rookies before they actually sign the deals and then get a Burns extension done to get the room back.

No we don't have to . Contracts are backloaded and signing bonuses are prorated so the cap hit can be as little or as large as we want. Last year the number one pick had a 4 year deal 37 million. So if we gave him a 16 million dollar signing bonus and a 1 million salary for 2023 our cap hit would be 5 million. Or with 27 million in cap space we could make the hit bigger this year. But the cap isn't a limiter to what we can do. If we signed Burns to a huge 5 year deal for 125 million our cap hit could be as small as 8 mil this year if we give him a 40 million dollar signing bonus and a 2 million dollar salary for 2023. The guaranteed money is the biggest thing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

A chart that lists teams in a more logical order along with a comment from Jeremy Fowler...

 

 

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

People keep posting crap like this like Samir is some sort of magician.

Using future cap space is really some sort of genius move? DJ Chark will still be counting against our cap in 2027! He signed a 1 year deal.

At the end of the day cap space is cap space and what doesn’t get used can be rolled over anyways but using multiple void years isn’t smart 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

 

People keep posting crap like this like Samir is some sort of magician.

Using future cap space is really some sort of genius move? DJ Chark will still be counting against our cap in 2027! He signed a 1 year deal.

At the end of the day cap space is cap space and what doesn’t get used can be rolled over anyways but using multiple void years isn’t smart 

Stfu, samir is a walking two 3rd round picks, he is a genius and if you disagree you are SELF SABOTAGING!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Has the league just decided they don't care about calling this a penalty anymore? It's crazy how many times every week players are moving towards the LOS while in motion when the ball is snapped, sometimes it's pretty egregious too.  This really shouldn't even be a hard one to call, it's so obvious when a player is running in motion while drifting towards the LOS, and sometimes it's not even a drift as much as clearly running on an angle towards the LOS and not parallel to it.
    • I beg to differ. I would take our young core of offensive players over the 49ers. Panthers: Receivers Tmac, Legette, Coker, Horn Jr. 49ers: Receivers  Pearsall, Jennings, Borne, Robinson The 49ers have the edge at Qb due to experience, but if Young ever puts it together he may have more upside. Mccaffrey and Dowdle are a push this season, Mccaffrey is still great out of the backfield catching the ball, but he's been inefficient running this season, the 49ers are dead last in the NFL in rushing yards a game and near the bottom in yards per attempt.  Their defense without Warner and Bosa, it's not even close to actual playmakers, they don't have a Derek Brown on the D-line or a JC Horn, Trevon Moehrig in the secondary. 
    • Same. And Slavin. I really miss Slavin, and this game shows the team does as well.
×
×
  • Create New...