Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pauline believes it's Stroud, but Reich wants AR


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Ocpanthertew714 said:

I'm curious tho as someone supposedly on the AR train.

If he is what this organization deems to be the franchise, does it really matter where he is selected?

Did they pay a steep price to get AR at No 1? Yeah. But if they were worried that he wouldn’t absolutely be available at a lower pick, then jumping to get “the guy” is absolutely worth it. Is he going to be the pick? I doubt it. But if he is, then I’ll be all-in on it. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bro Bryce has been the projected #1 pick since last year.

 

I get the size question, but don't act like this dude can't play the QB position. Ignore the size he has the best tape of all the QB's.

Tua was also the projected #1 pick in his draft for awhile...... I bet the Bengals are glad they didn't take him.. 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bro Bryce has been the projected #1 pick since last year.

 

I get the size question, but don't act like this dude can't play the QB position. Ignore the size he has the best tape of all the QB's.

A) You can't ignore the size.

B) I'm not sure he does have the best tape (especially when it comes to projection)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Daniel Mullaly said:

Did they pay a steep price to get AR at No 1? Yeah. But if they were worried that he wouldn’t absolutely be available at a lower pick, then jumping to get “the guy” is absolutely worth it. Is he going to be the pick? I doubt it. But if he is, then I’ll be all-in on it. 

If they take Richardson (they won't) then he's won them over since the trade.

It supports the theory that they made the trade without a definitive QB in mind 'cos you don't make that move based on his college stats / how fast he runs. You've been blown away by the tape and his interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

A) You can't ignore the size.

B) I'm not sure he does have the best tape (especially when it comes to projection)

A) Nobody is ignoring the size. What some analysts have said is that they don't believe size is as big of a concern in today's NFL than it was many years ago due to all the changes. Most who prefer him are saying that the risk is we'll worth the reward.

B) He absolutely does have the best tape, which is probably the most weighted item when it comes to projection and grading. And, honestly, he did more with less against better competition.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

B) He absolutely does have the best tape, which is probably the most weighted item when it comes to projection and grading. And, honestly, he did more with less against better competition.

lolololololololololololololol

 

::takesbreath::

 

lolololololololololololololol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

A) Nobody is ignoring the size. What some analysts have said is that they don't believe size is as big of a concern in today's NFL than it was many years ago due to all the changes. Most who prefer him are saying that the risk is we'll worth the reward.

I know a lot of people are making this argument but it's just a weird argument to make when I saw Tua getting ragdolled and brain damaged this year with my own two eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, top dawg said:

A) Nobody is ignoring the size. What some analysts have said is that they don't believe size is as big of a concern in today's NFL than it was many years ago due to all the changes. Most who prefer him are saying that the risk is we'll worth the reward.

B) He absolutely does have the best tape, which is probably the most weighted item when it comes to projection and grading. And, honestly, he did more with less against better competition.

Young has great tape and probably the best of the bunch, but it's far from perfect.  Watch him against LSU (who probably has the best DL talent of any team he played last year).  Their athletic defensive front gave him issues and that's something he will face every year in the NFL.  He also had a great OL and the best RB out of all of the prospects.  Stroud had the best WR by a long shot (and probably the best OL) while Young had the best RB.  It really is hard to project college QBs in the NFL and I'm glad it isn't my job to do so.  

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...