Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson “knocked” S2 cognitive test “out of the park”.


DFive
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

So AR's camp releases a vague unsubstantiated rumor.  Surprised this didn't happen earlier. and what exactly does out of the park mean?

I mean they're not fooling anyone - the NFL teams have access to all of these scores. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rebelrouser said:

By tape do you mean highlights? Because i watched complete games and he was complete crap. Maybe he is the ultimate qb mind in the ultimate qb body that only completes 53.8% of his passes.  Was he day dreaming out there or something?

If you're box score scouting you won't like Richardson.

If you watch the tape you're blown away by him. He obviously needs work (he's 20 years old), but as said earlier today, he makes incredibly difficult stuff look easy.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

Bryce was not the best QB in college for 2 years now. Hooker was outplaying him until injury, Caleb Williams outplayed him. 
 

And you think there aren’t risks taking a dude who had dud performances against Texas and LSU? Or that while he was out the backup QB who couldn’t even play QB scored 3 TDs? And that a Bryce lead team didn’t make the playoffs in his final year? 
 

Every QB in this class has reasons to be concerned over their performance. 

I mean if you're box score scouting, Stroud had a better year than Young this year too (you could argue for Clayton Tune too, but I wouldn't do that).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

If you're box score scouting you won't like Richardson.

If you watch the tape you're blown away by him. He obviously needs work (he's 20 years old), but as said earlier today, he makes incredibly difficult stuff look easy.

This gonna shock people

 

Nfl red flags... he's got the least by looking at tape. 

 

Stroud actually has a narrow build and has pocket issues when he isn't cleanly protected.  

 

Young has a slight build and is small in height which is a huge red flag in the NFL. I mean he's not even as thickly built as Murry. 

 

Richardson has mechanic issues that look fixable and lack of college experience compared to the above 2... 

 

That lack of experience is actually a good thing in his case because that makes you think the mechanics are fixable and word about his work ethic and football iq makes me think he'll work his ass off to fix them and succeed doing so. 

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, carpanfan96 said:

This gonna shock people

 

Nfl red flags... he's got the least by looking at tape. 

 

Stroud actually has a narrow build and has pocket issues when he isn't cleanly protected.  

 

Young has a slight build and is small in height which is a huge red flag in the NFL. I mean he's not even as thickly built as Murry. 

 

Richardson has mechanic issues that look fixable and lack of college experience compared to the above 2... 

 

That lack of experience is actually a good thing in his case because that makes you think the mechanics are fixable and word about his work ethic and football iq makes me think he'll work his ass off to fix them and succeed doing so. 

AR going to Pete Carroll would scare me enough to pick him #1 if I were Frank Reich a QB whisperer in my own right.

Nightmares.

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m done with this argument.. At this point dude’s will claim they saw something on tape that really isn’t there and they will give excuses for things that they don’t do for others and they are letting workouts in underware overvalue actual productions, actual achievements and actual numbers.. 

Like I said in another thread only thing that stoping Richardson for being number 1.. Is the 3 years he spent in college… He could have just showed up to the combine and had some of you drooling about potential and rode that better.. Then actually having film out there.. 

Leon Sancastle anyone

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WOW!! said:

I’m done with this argument.. At this point dude’s will claim they saw something on tape that really isn’t there and they will give excuses for things that they don’t do for others and they are letting workouts in underware overvalue actual productions, actual achievements and actual numbers.. 

Like I said in another thread only thing that stoping Richardson for being number 1.. Is the 3 years he spent in college… He could have just showed up to the combine and had some of you drooling about potential and rode that better.. Then actually having film out there.. 

Leon Sancastle anyone

 

I honestly don't care about his combined performance,  it's what I've heard about his whiteboard work and meetings more than anything.  Considering he's the only one of the top three qb's with prototypical nfl frame and size. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

I mean tape not highlights. From pre snap to the throw, the processing and football iq is easily seen. It's the mechanics breakdown on throws that causes the majority of his issues 

Yeah got you..

okay addition.. 

Some ppl are valuing 3rd party views of a event they weren’t actually at and “prototype”  measurements over actual film, numbers and performances..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...