Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young, Stroud, Corral

poundaway

By poundaway,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

NanuqoftheNorth Grand Master

NanuqoftheNorth

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

And what do you base this on? That he never got to practice or play, or that he got injured in a preseason game with the 4th stringers?

If stupid was gold, this place would be Ft Knox.

Not sure why you felt the necessity to be insulting.  Look, I'm in favor of keeping the guy, but anyone that's been following the Panthers this year knows there has been talk of Matt being available for a trade.  Local media covered it last month.

  https://www.wcnc.com/article/sports/nfl/panthers/carolina-panthers-matt-corral-trade-rumors/275-6a0a3c61-f84e-42cf-a071-f6d141da9d47

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Loyalty4Life said:

The 49ers have shown you can't have enough quality QB's on your roster.  I'd rather keep him then trade him as he's on a rookie deal and we've seen late round QB's end up better than 1st rounders many times before. 

Carolina likes throws darts to see if they can hit the bullseye.  Why not wait to see where the Corral dart ended up hitting.

One of my thoughts is that they have a second rookie QB out there that they want and perhaps think will be available way late or as UDFA. There are some really good options out there in the "who the heck are they" lists.

Personally, I think you're going to see at least one day two or three QB pull a Brock Purdy and prove to be something pretty cool. My bet is that it is Max Dugan from TCU. Not saying he's be in my top 3 choices (Young, Stroud, Hooker) but he could be a gamer out there for someone.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

It just makes no sense to dispose of a guy you spent not-insignificant assets on to acquire, a guy that has had *no* chance to show anything yet. Young, cheap, unknown potential at the most important position on the field. Yeah, let's just dump him, smdh.

Its going to be funny as hell when he turns into our kirk cousins when Young gets hurt.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
grateflday Collaborator

grateflday

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Wundrbread33 said:

He would be poached from the PS unless there is a way to protect his rights. 
 

 

This is why I’d like to see an exemption to the 53 man roster rule and allow an extra spot for a third QB. With how critical the position is to the success of a team, seeing how far play drops already with most backups, and how often teams end up starting more than just two different people in a season …. Allow the third QB on a roster so teams can developed guys without risk of losing them via practice squad etc.   or having to sacrifice QB depth for depth on roster elsewhere. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

How come everyone can see it coming but the YOUNGSTERS?!

Not just "hurt", crushed, mauled, maimed flattened.

This ain't college football.

You realize that you are talking about how much more durable Coral will be than Young.  Do you even hear yourself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Veteran

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I think Corral could develop nicely into a backup for Young. Has similar quickness and is pretty accurate with a quick release as well. You could run a similar playbook… He just needs to make the roster first and then who knows.

Is Young really better than Corral though? Put Young at Ole Miss, in Corral's situation, and what does Young do? I'd almost guarantee it's not much, if at all, better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PantherChris
      PANTHERS @ HURRICANES ROUND 3 GAME 1

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • PantherChris
      RODS gotta GO

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • woahfraze
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By woahfraze · Posted

      Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...