Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023 Quantifying Quarterbacks


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

Took screenshots of the different tabs on the spreadsheet and pasted them below for folks on mobile (and for the ppl that don't want to navigate a spreadsheet :P)

 

Index
image.thumb.png.9e761ff2ea1e9c05d77c93ac25f8f1c3.png

 

Player Schedules
image.png.946d144ce14b7653fe2014d76de69c5a.png


Play Environment
image.thumb.png.539f724f6a90b5bc2dfac3bcdb374124.png


Pass-Rush Opposition
image.png.dc1017412104063f863e3cd620cf82c9.png

 

Total Accuracy/Playmaking
image.thumb.png.a74593ac76a15185a90f276305ba4f4d.png

 

Target Area Rate
image.thumb.png.431f8eaca114a64b320d8bfd00a1a6b9.png


Accuracy Breakdown
image.thumb.png.7ec2a5b3799088b3763b3de2cc3c43ff.png


3rd/4th Down
image.png.f115396ea3ad394f95b2fcb1540752aa.png


Red Zone
image.png.6d2028aae0c935947095c27cbd62718c.png


4th Quarter/OT
image.png.6ff19e669591ac32430a19240305f63b.png

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If you go by those #'s then its stroud all the way.  However a few of those data points look a bit off

Look at that ridiculous WR drop percentage for OSU. 

Brian Hartline is a gotdamn wizard.

Also shows that Richardson isn't as inaccurate as first glance. Love data like this. 

One thing this does not chart is how often the receivers ran the wrong/poor route, and you can't really chart that with film without knowing the playcall/design. I'd assume there were more wrong routes run for guys like Levis/Richardson than Stroud or Young. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Look at that ridiculous WR drop percentage for OSU. 

Brian Hartline is a gotdamn wizard.

Also shows that Richardson isn't as inaccurate as first glance. Love data like this. 

One thing this does not chart is how often the receivers ran the wrong/poor route, and you can't really chart that with film without knowing the playcall/design. I'd assume there were more wrong routes run for guys like Levis/Richardson than Stroud or Young. 

I mean he is Richardson is 10-12 percent worse than everyone on this list accuracy wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I mean he is Richardson is 10-12 percent worse than everyone on this list accuracy wise.

Also he is similar to Cam in that he throws a ton of rockets no matter the range. He isn't much of a touch passer and that can hurt him in those 0-5 and 5-10 yard throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Also he is similar to Cam in that he throws a ton of rockets no matter the range. He isn't much of a touch passer and that can hurt him in those 0-5 and 5-10 yard throws.

i've seen him put a nice touch on the ball from time to time. i think it's one of those things that got better as time went on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some things stick out that will need to improve in the NFL. Young's 16-20 and 20+ accuracy is lacking. That's the money area that keeps defenses honest. CJ Stroud also has the tight window accuracy you will need to make a difference at the next level while Young is closer to Anthony Richardson in that area. I can't wait to see how both these guys turn out. Hopefully just as Bryce is going to a very good organizational situation with us Stroud will find a good team as well.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting stats, hard to come to a conclusion on any QB when everything is factored in.  Richardson is the most intriguing QB in the draft to me, there are glimpses of what he could be capable of.  But it could be 3 years before anyone knows how good he could be.  Which is challenging when you only get 4 + 1 years on the rookie contract.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I've been trying to tell people. It's obvious when folks have only looked at baseline stats and haven't actually watched him play.

I dunno, I never go off stats, barely ever even know what a prospect’s stats look like unless it’s mentioned here. I just use what I see with my own two eyes and Richardson was more prone to wild throws , and even when they weren’t wild they weren’t well placed often making the receiver have to work harder to catch, than just about anyone I’ve ever seen. Maybe most of that was due to wrong routes or something I have no way of knowing since I’m not in the huddle or QB room, but just based on the frequency that passes dropped to the ground nowhere near the receiver I’ve determined for my own opinion that Richardson is, right now, an awful passer. 100% based on watching every pass he has thrown that’s available on YouTube. 
 

on a related topic, I really miss that website that existed years ago that would chop up games of prospects into every play they were involved in, for QBs it was entire games with every single throw and passing play. I forget the name of it, I remember it had a red theme. That site was great and really helpful for armchair GMing. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there has been a lot of negative press around Stroud, but man.

Knock:  His receivers are running wide open.  Fact:  Stroud threw just as many tight window passes as Young, and was the most accurate QB in the class when doing so.

Knock:  Stroud can't play under pressure or outside the pocket.  Fact:  Stroud has the highest accuracy in the class under pressure and outside the pocket and is pressured at just slightly below the average for the class this year.

If a Huddler (good job OP) can dig these numbers out, you have to believe that teams have done the same.  Looking at those numbers, I'd have a very hard time not taking the guy (Stroud).  I wonder if all the hysteria around Young is a product of the highlights instead of the body of work.  Does Stroud just make it look so easy that we gravitate toward Young who makes it look like a million bucks?

It's an interesting discussion.

Both QB's seem to have said all the right things and shown all the right personality traits.  The mystery stops soon.

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great information, thanks op. I don’t see anything that should change opinions. AR has accuracy issues, Bryce Young pretty good at just about everything but lacked explosive plays, Stroud very accurate and his receivers and line were great (holy crap 0.89% drop rate). I think it’s clear you can design an offense for Stroud and tell him where to go with the ball and he can get it there. But that’s always been clear. If I had to guess, I think he will probably look like a really good regular season QB who struggles in the playoffs.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the exception of knowing our obvious needs and who we were talking to along the way, my question is this:  How did so many people start on this Jalon Walker frenzy?  I think this--everyone wants to have a voice, make a prediction.  Now with social media and 24 hour tv, networks, etc.  it is more like a middle school grapevine than it is a process where people actually dig for real evidence and reasons.  Speculative journalism is lazy, and since there are now 2,348.356 podcasters with basement studios blasting nonsense into our phones all day, I think they just cut and paste ideas.  Yes, coaches lie and mislead, but I don't think Morgan or Canales did.  You are only as reliable as your sources.  Was Morgan more deliberate this year?  I think he heard the gossip and decided to downplay WR.  He said, (paraphrasing) "We like our QB room.  We will probably add to it at some point."  Not a lie, but definitely downplaying things. I was convinced that we needed a blazer to keep safeties honest, but to be honest, I am not sure that we have the QB with the arm to keep safeties honest.  We have Coker who is 6'1", Theilen is 6'2", and Legette is 6'3" and now TMac is 6'4"+.  It seems size has more value than blazing deep speed.  If I had known they thought that, I might have gone with TMac all along--I thought he was not a good fit.  And if you look at the Panther guide and consider the talent they met with in the first round, there was only one offensive player--TMac. There was another quote that Morgan made that might have been a bit revealing or at least directive. (Paraphrasing) "We want players that were productive in college."  Well, TMac was very productive. In 2023 and in 2024, he averaged 108.8 yards per game.   He is also a great artist.  Drew this portrait of Bryce Young from memory: Many people spent 3 months absolutely confident that Jalon Walker would play edge here. We had a need at edge, but with Clowney, Wonnum, and Jones, were we OK if we drafted a second round Edge? Was Walker the answer?  Unlike Hunter, he is a versatile player who could be awesome in the right system, but if used as a pure edge, he is not a top 10 player.  I was convinced that we would sign Jalon and as much as I like the kid, I could not feel good about the pick.  Mykel Williams scared me.  Both might be great players, but I could not see it.  So was Scourton productive? He was as a Jr when he was standing.  When asked to be other things, he lost his edge (pun intended). In essence, I think we got the best pure edge when you take away the other things he was supposed to do.  Walker's productivity was based on his versatility--something he would lose as a pure edge--so we would not really be meeting needs at edge.  Scourton, on the other hand, is better when not asked to be versatile.  Princely had 10.5 sacks in the SEC.  It simply makes sense.
    • I think they will too. Renfrow will use this opportunity to get in shape and get paid for it. After he's cut he will probably get picked up by someone after preseason.
×
×
  • Create New...