Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Predicting Bryce Young's rookie year

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

6,000 passing yards, 99% completion (Ian Thomas drops one), a solid 50 TDs. 

or

3800ish passing yards.  20 TDs, 11 INTs, 64% completion, 1 rushing TD, 200 yards on the ground. 

 

Do I get to choose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggieLean Grand Master

AggieLean

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

This is good.  Only thing I would add is that there will be 2-3 batted balls causing melt down overreactions from some folks.

First time a ball is batted down, the huddle…

 

lol I can’t wait. 

0F961417-7BCF-431A-B0E3-EE724E0F701F.gif

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted
On 5/1/2023 at 7:28 PM, NAS said:

Interestingly, I also just asked the chat AI and it reluctantly gave me a prediction with low confidence.  apparently it's even more optimistic than I am.  Here's the exact response:

As an AI language model, I can provide you with a speculative estimate of Bryce Young's future stats, but please keep in mind that these predictions are based purely on statistical trends and do not account for factors such as injuries, team performance, or changes in coaching staff or scheme. Additionally, I cannot guarantee the accuracy of these predictions as they are based on limited information and assumptions.

Assuming that Bryce Young continues to develop as a quarterback and stays healthy, here's a speculative estimate of his future stats:

  • Passing yards: 4,000 - 4,500
  • Completion percentage: 65% - 70%
  • Touchdowns: 30 - 35
  • Interceptions: 5 - 10
  • Rushing yards: 300 - 500
  • Rushing touchdowns: 3 - 6

Again, please keep in mind that these are purely speculative estimates based on limited information and should be taken with a grain of salt.

Also predict that Panthers will win between 8-10 games, sounds about right.  

Which chat do you use, the one i was using flat out won't do predictions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Panthero said:

Which chat do you use, the one i was using flat out won't do predictions. 

OpenAI

I had to convince it several times in the conversation after it said it won’t do predictions. Like a human it caved lol

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted (edited)

I predict that he will be scrutinized, criticized and marginalized by most of the fans. I expect that he will be vilified, crucified or glorified by the fans no matter what he does. So business as usual. Personally, I think he will eventually be the best qb we've had since Newton. It may not show at first but it's there and will show itself as the season plays out.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Khyber53
      WWE pay per view and programming thread

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • CPantherKing
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...